![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I had it tested at an FBO that does prop balance and they found about 0.2 ips at the prop (FAA acceptable) and about 0.4 (+?) ips at the other end and told me it was the engine. R1.... .2 ips is 'faa acceptable' but any tech should be able to get it below 0.1 ips. Sometimes I see a cross-effect in which the rear is running big because of a prop being installed in an angle that is not optimun. Another factor is the static weights on the prop itself. The adjustment may resolve an aft imbalance. What was the phase angle difference? However in most cases it is a crank or rod imblance that is probably causing it. But as Ben said I could probably do the pistons/rods myself with a good scale. But balancing complex rotating masses like a crankshaft requires a proper machine. R2. You need more than a scale for the rods. A rod is suspended by each end and in turn the big ends and the small ends are weighed, the C.G. is deduced. In other words the rotating and the reciprocating masses are measured. Auto guys will then make up a bobweight of nuts and bolts equal to the rotating part which they add to the crank throws and that is then spun on a dynamic balance machine. Sorry, I disagree that automotive people can do a better job. How many auto shops check the nitriding and heat treatment? R3: The issue isn't RPM unless you are relating to 'flexible or non-flexible rotors' Typically Auto cranks are balanced by drilling the counterweights a little deeper or what ever. I can't say about Franklins, but Lycomings and Continentals do not have counterweight molding in the casting because the arrangement is a 'balanced' engine in the 1`st order by design. In the 'approved' after market, Lyc and Cont cranks are further balanced the same at the mfg does but to a finer degree. in my experience, it hasn't been whether is the balance is better than '3 mils' as the factory print specifies, but rather it has been making sure you do have not a sloppy part with some 40- 80 gram-inches imbalnce that slipped out the door! good luck Kent Felkins |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
...Auto guys will then make up a bobweight of nuts and bolts
... equal to the rotating part which they add to the crank throws and that is ... then spun on a dynamic balance machine. ... Yes. Thats true for V8's or V6, etc. But not needed for opposing cyl engines. .. I can't say about Franklins, but Lycomings and Continentals do not have ... counterweight molding in the casting Its the same for the Franklin - its an opposing flat 6. Opposing flats are inherently easier to balance. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On last comment... That's one reason why opposing flats are lighter
engines not needing the extra counterweights. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() R2. You need more than a scale for the rods. A rod is suspended by each end and in turn the big ends and the small ends are weighed, the C.G. is deduced. In other words the rotating and the reciprocating masses are measured. Auto guys will then make up a bobweight of nuts and bolts equal to the rotating part which they add to the crank throws and that is then spun on a dynamic balance machine /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// This is correct to a point. I have balanced more engines then I care to remember and I have never had a motor where I didn't weigh all the rods as is. For instance if you have 8 rods and 7 weigh in at 580 or so grams and one weighs 640, you can grind /machine /rub / pray,,, what ever you want to do there is no way you can remove from the big end or small end to get "that" heavy rod balance with the other seven. So the point I was making is one could gram out the parts at home to find out pretty darn fast is they have a bad match of stuff. Once the motor gets to a quality auto machine shop they will put the rods on a fixture and duplicate big end and small end weights. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "stol" wrote in message ups.com... R2. You need more than a scale for the rods. A rod is suspended by each end and in turn the big ends and the small ends are weighed, the C.G. is deduced. In other words the rotating and the reciprocating masses are measured. Auto guys will then make up a bobweight of nuts and bolts equal to the rotating part which they add to the crank throws and that is then spun on a dynamic balance machine /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// This is correct to a point. I have balanced more engines then I care to remember and I have never had a motor where I didn't weigh all the rods as is. For instance if you have 8 rods and 7 weigh in at 580 or so grams and one weighs 640, you can grind /machine /rub / pray,,, what ever you want to do there is no way you can remove from the big end or small end to get "that" heavy rod balance with the other seven. So the point I was making is one could gram out the parts at home to find out pretty darn fast is they have a bad match of stuff. Once the motor gets to a quality auto machine shop they will put the rods on a fixture and duplicate big end and small end weights. gee.... a fixture... What does a quality auto machine shop use? A CNC machine? Kent Felkins |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() R3: The issue isn't RPM unless you are relating to 'flexible or non-flexible rotors' Typically Auto cranks are balanced by drilling the counterweights a little deeper or what ever. I can't say about Franklins, but Lycomings and Continentals do not have counterweight molding in the casting because the arrangement is a 'balanced' engine in the 1`st order by design. ///////////////////////////////////////// Look close at the Lyc / Cont cranks and you will see balance marks on the rod throw end. As you have pointed out they don't have counter weights so thats the only logical place to correct a large imbalance that happens during the crank forging process. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "stol" wrote in message oups.com... ///////////////////////////////////////// Look close at the Lyc / Cont cranks and you will see balance marks on the rod throw end. As you have pointed out they don't have counter weights so thats the only logical place to correct a large imbalance that happens during the crank forging process. Yes, you have noticed the factory and aftermarket balance marks. Have you ever checked the depth of material removed? How deep is the nitride layer usually? What do you do about the bifilar dampers that most higher horsepower crankshafts have? It is a misnomer that these are commonly called crank counterweights. You install new bushings and rollers? Do you balance with them installed on the crank? What about a Lycoming ring gear? btw, thanks your three posts in "setting me straight". Kent Felkins Felkins Aircraft Ltd. FAA CRS WNKR918K Tulsa Oklahoma |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "stol" wrote in message oups.com... ///////////////////////////////////////// Look close at the Lyc / Cont cranks and you will see balance marks on the rod throw end. As you have pointed out they don't have counter weights so thats the only logical place to correct a large imbalance that happens during the crank forging process. Yes, you have noticed the factory and aftermarket balance marks. Have you ever checked the depth of material removed? How deep is the nitride layer usually? What do you do about the bifilar dampers that most higher horsepower crankshafts have? It is a misnomer that these are commonly called crank counterweights. You install new bushings and rollers? Do you balance with them installed on the crank? What about a Lycoming ring gear? btw, thanks for your three reply posts for "setting me straight". Kent Felkins Felkins Aircraft Ltd. FAA CRS WNKR918K Tulsa Oklahoma |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kent Felkins
Felkins Aircraft Ltd. FAA CRS WNKR918K Tulsa Oklahoma ///////////////////////////////////////// I was just giving out my two cents worth. After all this is the Rec, Aviation, " HOMEBUILT" site. I would never post something like this on the rec. aviation "certified" site. After all the FAA knows all.I still think Lycoming murdered 13 people by selling a inferior product and the FAA was in bed with them the whole way. I have owed several certifeis planes in my life and I never want to see a yellow tag again. Those things have tried to kill me a couple of times and the funny thing is the Feds didnt even investigate the repair stations involved. Now I will head at and fly my homebuilt plane powered by a Firewall forward I designed and built. The air is good and thick at -34f. Peace and Merry Christmas from Jackson Hole Wy Ben www.haaspowerair.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pocket PC Weight and Balance Spreadsheet | Navzilla Support | Piloting | 0 | October 9th 05 11:47 PM |
Cessna 172 F Weight and Balance | [email protected] | Owning | 8 | September 22nd 05 02:38 AM |
crankshaft counterweights | Dave Butler | Owning | 10 | February 10th 05 04:08 PM |
Wierd vibration -- Prop or engine, balance or not??? | Chuck | Owning | 17 | December 1st 04 02:12 PM |
Grob102 elevator balance mods | OscarCVox | Soaring | 0 | April 1st 04 11:32 PM |