A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Crankshaft balance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 8th 05, 12:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crankshaft balance


"stol" wrote in message
ups.com...
I'm curious about how you have 0.4 ips vibration problem?


Pistons and rings are not part of crankshaft balance.
Pins bearings?

Let me set some things straight for ya. Any good racing machine shop
can balance a motor far better then the vast majority of FAA approved
places. In fact Lycoming can't even built a crank for some models they
produce that won't break, and they have killed people this way. So much
for the FAA keeping a close eye on quality... As for nitriting and heat
treating, this is an every day detail in the racing market and is down
to a science, not black magic... Pistons and rings and circlips are
part of the rotating/reciprocating assembly and need to be balanced
too. Good shops even add in a factor for the weight of oil that clings
to the balanced mass to get it perfect.



Well Excuse meee..........!!!!

Circlips? Are you referring to piston pin circlips? They are not used in
Lycomings or Continental aircraft engines.
Tell me which models of Lycomings break cranks? I don't want to fly behind
those.

I'm still wondering what the pin bearings are.

Please direct me to to a engineering reference or paper that discusses the
factor that discusses the weight of oil that clings to the balanced mass.
Otherwise that is somebody's guess.. their own black magic.
Kent Felkins


  #2  
Old December 8th 05, 04:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crankshaft balance

Here is some more discussion about balancing:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...9345c98a2408b1

  #3  
Old December 10th 05, 01:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crankshaft balance

Abripl,

I lost the messages that began this thread so I forget whether you had a 4
or 6 cyl. I also do not remember if I asked you about your prop position.

I stopped by Aircraft Specialties Services today. I looked at several
Franklin cranks and some rods.

Anyway, for one source, if you decide to send your crank and rods off for
balancing, talk to Harold or Bobby at A/c Spec. 800--826-9252
$115 for the crank balance and about $45 for the rods.


If you have any questions which I can help you with, you are welcome to
email me directly.

The bigotry expressed by others in this thread is bordering on getting
personal. I am going back to lurk mode.

good luck
Kent Felkins



"abripl" wrote in message
ups.com...
Here is some more discussion about balancing:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...9345c98a2408b1



  #4  
Old December 12th 05, 02:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crankshaft balance

Anyway, for one source, if you decide to send your crank and rods
off for
balancing, talk to Harold or Bobby at A/c Spec. 800--826-9252
$115 for the crank balance and about $45 for the rods.


If you have any questions which I can help you with, you are welcome to

email me directly.


The bigotry expressed by others in this thread is bordering on getting
personal. I am going back to lurk mode.


good luck
Kent Felkins



"abripl" wrote in message


Bigotry ???????? Hmmmmm. And I thought this was the rec.aviation.
"homebuilt" list? Of course we are suspect of the feds silly rules.
Look at their track record.. After all they are only 7 TRILLION dollars
in debt.

One more thing, if this is the Bobby I have heard of ,you better mark
your crank in a discreet place because he has been known to swap
customers good cranks for ones he has laying around that are of "lesser
quality". That way he can resell your good one and make a nice profit
and you get back a P.O.S.....

Happy Flying...

  #5  
Old December 13th 05, 01:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crankshaft balance


"
"abripl" wrote in message
One more thing, if this is the Bobby I have heard of ,you better mark
your crank in a discreet place because he has been known to swap
customers good cranks for ones he has laying around that are of "lesser
quality". That way he can resell your good one and make a nice profit
and you get back a P.O.S.....


I said I was going back to lurking, but I am coming back to this slop
trough for one more post.

I've watched this group for over ten years and occassionally have seen a
contributor who is sharp and experienced in their field and is willing to
relate their knowledge. Its like finding a diamond's in a goat's butt.
Other times though I just find a goat's butt.

This thread started out about some guy writing about franklin engine
vibration and crankshaft balance. I joined in to offer my opinion from my
18 or so years experience in the field.
And I get bashed for being FAA certified.
Then I infer I was could bring to this thread the experience of a
nationally known and well-respected firm who actually does the work on the
said type of crankshaft and connecting rods.
And somebody says the firm is a crook and rips off their customers.

The firm I am talking about has been in the business for close to 30
years and is still thriving and expanding. My business is thriving
too. You don't achieve that by ripping people off.

Parts trading is well known trick in in many fields. And savy people know
it.
And anyone savy knows aircraft cranks have discreet marks to begin with.

Whoever the Bobby you're thinking of must be some p.o.s working in the auto
shop in Jackson.

I could care less

Kent Felkins
Tulsa



  #6  
Old December 13th 05, 05:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crankshaft balance


"Fly" felk AT gbronline.com wrote

Parts trading is well known trick in in many fields. And savy people

know
it.
And anyone savy knows aircraft cranks have discreet marks to begin with.

Whoever the Bobby you're thinking of must be some p.o.s working in the

auto
shop in Jackson.

I could care less

Kent Felkins


Obviously, you could care less, or you would not have posted a rebuttal. He
may be correct, or may be incorrect. I did notice that you did a very nice
job of turning it around to slam someone else, however.

I don't know you from a hole in the ground. I'm glad you think you work in
a good shop. You would not be working in my shop, if you did not think
where you were working was a good place. Good for you.

That said, "my" opinion of what got you "rubbed the wrong way" was your
attitude that your way was the only way, and that because you worked on
aircraft engines, no one else might be capable of doing as good a job, or
better.

Around where I live, there are racing engine shops everywhere. They feed
the racing market with engines that up and coming future stars in the auto
racing world use. While you attempt to build engines that are reliable,
they only have to be reliable at very modest power levels. The
displacements of an aircraft engine that put out 200 HP, are putting out
over 750 HP in the racing world. They do so at the expense of a long life,
but they are very reliable in that designed life span. They strive to get
just a couple more HP, or a smoother engine, or one that will have better
fuel economy to beat their competition. They innovate, and experiment, and
develop things that are incorporated into future mass produced engine
designs.

All the while, you are rebuilding 1930's engines, with precious few
innovations. I'm glad someone is doing it, and doing it well. Don't be
offended when someone else says they are capable of doing it as good, or
better. Some may be able to do just that.

To think that these engine builders don't have some tricks that you are not
interested in, or allowed to do by the FAA, or capable of performing that
results in making a smoother running engine is extremely smug of you. I
have no doubt that some may be able to do some things your shop has never
even dreamed of.

The person posting got some technical details wrong, but so what. He is not
the racing engine rebuilder. They are out there, and do quite well, thank
you. You would do well to acknowledge the fact that others do know their
craft, and have pride in it, just as you do.

Feel free to jump in and offer advise, and opinions about subjects you are
well versed in. No doubt, you have a lot to offer this group.

The most valued members come here with humility, and knowledge, but enter
into discussions with the idea that they may find someone who knows as much
or more. There is always someone out there smarter than yourself. (or
myself)

With that, is the fact that some do not know when to shut up, or when to not
flame. Those are the pitfalls of a public forum. Thick skins are required.

soapbox = off.
--
Jim (Morgan) in NC

  #7  
Old December 21st 05, 02:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crankshaft balance

"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Fly" felk AT gbronline.com wrote

Parts trading is well known trick in in many fields. And savy people

know
it.
And anyone savy knows aircraft cranks have discreet marks to begin

with.

Whoever the Bobby you're thinking of must be some p.o.s working in the

auto
shop in Jackson.

I could care less

Kent Felkins


Obviously, you could care less, or you would not have posted a rebuttal.

He
may be correct, or may be incorrect. I did notice that you did a very

nice
job of turning it around to slam someone else, however.

I don't know you from a hole in the ground. I'm glad you think you work

in
a good shop. You would not be working in my shop, if you did not think
where you were working was a good place. Good for you.

That said, "my" opinion of what got you "rubbed the wrong way" was your
attitude that your way was the only way, and that because you worked on
aircraft engines, no one else might be capable of doing as good a job, or
better.

Around where I live, there are racing engine shops everywhere. They feed
the racing market with engines that up and coming future stars in the auto
racing world use. While you attempt to build engines that are reliable,
they only have to be reliable at very modest power levels. The
displacements of an aircraft engine that put out 200 HP, are putting out
over 750 HP in the racing world. They do so at the expense of a long

life,
but they are very reliable in that designed life span. They strive to get
just a couple more HP, or a smoother engine, or one that will have better
fuel economy to beat their competition. They innovate, and experiment,

and
develop things that are incorporated into future mass produced engine
designs.

All the while, you are rebuilding 1930's engines, with precious few
innovations. I'm glad someone is doing it, and doing it well. Don't be
offended when someone else says they are capable of doing it as good, or
better. Some may be able to do just that.

To think that these engine builders don't have some tricks that you are

not
interested in, or allowed to do by the FAA, or capable of performing that
results in making a smoother running engine is extremely smug of you. I
have no doubt that some may be able to do some things your shop has never
even dreamed of.

The person posting got some technical details wrong, but so what. He is

not
the racing engine rebuilder. They are out there, and do quite well, thank
you. You would do well to acknowledge the fact that others do know their
craft, and have pride in it, just as you do.

Feel free to jump in and offer advise, and opinions about subjects you are
well versed in. No doubt, you have a lot to offer this group.

The most valued members come here with humility, and knowledge, but enter
into discussions with the idea that they may find someone who knows as

much
or more. There is always someone out there smarter than yourself. (or
myself)

With that, is the fact that some do not know when to shut up, or when to

not
flame. Those are the pitfalls of a public forum. Thick skins are

required.

soapbox = off.
--
Jim (Morgan) in NC

Well said!
Peter


  #8  
Old December 9th 05, 04:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crankshaft balance

here are some links to the Lyc mess. I am amazed you are in the
industry and have not heard of this fiasco..

www.bizjournals.com/wichita/ stories/2005/02/14/daily30.html

  #9  
Old December 9th 05, 04:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crankshaft balance

Another link to bad cranks....

eaa563.org/Newsletters/ 2002%20News%20Letters/0203/vol9issue3.pdf

  #10  
Old December 9th 05, 04:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crankshaft balance

more bad "CERTIFIED cranks

www.machinedesign.com/ASP/viewSelectedArticle.
asp?strArticleId=58969&strSite=MDSite&catId=0 -

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pocket PC Weight and Balance Spreadsheet Navzilla Support Piloting 0 October 9th 05 11:47 PM
Cessna 172 F Weight and Balance [email protected] Owning 8 September 22nd 05 02:38 AM
crankshaft counterweights Dave Butler Owning 10 February 10th 05 04:08 PM
Wierd vibration -- Prop or engine, balance or not??? Chuck Owning 17 December 1st 04 02:12 PM
Grob102 elevator balance mods OscarCVox Soaring 0 April 1st 04 11:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.