![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
... "PaulaJay1" wrote in message ... Coming into CLE the other day the controller ask if I had RNAV and I said no, that I was /G ,that is, IFR GPS. He said that it was the same and gave me direct..... Is it the same, should I have answered yes to his question? Of course I can navigate direct but do I have "RNAV"? Chuck Yes, Yes, and Yes. I doubt the controller cared *which* kind of RNAV you had, only that you had the navigation capability. Even if you'd had only LORAN, you'd still have answered "Yes". ---JRC--- What do you mean only LORAN? Just kidding. I realize that it is now ancient technology but it works just fine. RNAV means that you can navigate random routes. LORAN and GPS both provide that capability. How come there is no designator for an approach certified GPS? /G only means that you have at least an enroute and terminal certified GPS. I presume that pilots who have an approach certified GPS have to ask for a specific approach. ------------------------------- Travis |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RNAV approaches | Kevin Chandler | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | September 18th 03 06:00 PM |
Are handheld GPSes becoming a defacto primary nav source? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 44 | September 13th 03 10:36 PM |
GPS-Y GPS-Z database question | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | September 5th 03 04:54 AM |
Another IFR "oops" | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | July 21st 03 09:02 PM |