![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "karel" wrote Sounds reasonable, yes, but they DO look cool! Wouldn't want the complication of an extra (belden?) cable, though. If some clever one could find a way to maken them open automagically, now that would be great! How about using ram pressure to keep them closed, via a pneumatic cylinder, then when ram pressure is less, like slowing for landings, they open up, probably spring assisted. -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message ... "karel" wrote Sounds reasonable, yes, but they DO look cool! Wouldn't want the complication of an extra (belden?) cable, though. If some clever one could find a way to maken them open automagically, now that would be great! How about using ram pressure to keep them closed, via a pneumatic cylinder, then when ram pressure is less, like slowing for landings, they open up, probably spring assisted. -- Jim in NC You could also use something similar to a Piper stall vane, where at some predetermined AOA, the vane operates a switch that opens the doors. Alternately, you could plumb a pressure sensitive switch into the pitot/static line. You'd need to have the thing rigged to fail in the "open" position, or an electrical glitch could result in a landing that went crunch, instead of chirp (or bounce, bounce, thud.) KB |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Kyle Boatright" wrote)
You'd need to have the thing rigged to fail in the "open" position, or an electrical glitch could result in a landing that went crunch, instead of chirp (or bounce, bounce, thud.) If one were to open and one remain closed ...well now: Let's see, if you landed on one wheel you'd maybe swing around to the closed pant side. Unless you tapped the brakes, then I suppose you'd swing (pivot!) around back to the free wheel side. Talk about some nasty differential steering. Montblack |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Montblack" wrote in message ... Let's see, if you landed on one wheel you'd maybe swing around to the closed pant side. Unless you tapped the brakes, then I suppose you'd swing (pivot!) around back to the free wheel side. I'm not sure you would even feel it if you landed with one or both doors closed. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C.D.Damron" wrote in message news:vnumf.393883$084.251527@attbi_s22... I'm not sure you would even feel it if you landed with one or both doors closed. True enough, but I am also not sure that you would not end up on your nose or in a nasty ground loop. IMHO the added expense, complexity, and risk is not worth the presumed 2 mph speed gain. Vaughn |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vaughn" wrote in message ... "C.D.Damron" wrote in message news:vnumf.393883$084.251527@attbi_s22... I'm not sure you would even feel it if you landed with one or both doors closed. True enough, but I am also not sure that you would not end up on your nose or in a nasty ground loop. IMHO the added expense, complexity, and risk is not worth the presumed 2 mph speed gain. Vaughn I heard that leaving them closed for landing simply scrapes through the doors and the pilot didn't even notice. I don't see any costs quoted, but I imagine they would cot a little more than simple pants. I like the auto actuating ideas... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Archer wheel pants on a Cherokee | [email protected] | Owning | 8 | November 23rd 05 02:43 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Repairing fiberglass wheel pants | Jay Honeck | Owning | 18 | September 25th 04 03:55 AM |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
Speed Astir | Guy Acheson | Soaring | 0 | December 11th 03 02:24 AM |