A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Garmin takes over



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 2nd 04, 05:37 PM
PaulaJay1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Peter
writes:

When the 430 was new, many people feared that kind of
integration of GPS, NAV and COMM, citing all sorts of reasons.


When the display on my 430 went out, the GPS, NAV AND COM were unusable.

Chuck
  #2  
Old March 3rd 04, 12:32 AM
Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This is why I like my setup. A standalone IFR/GPS, and a standalone
NavCom, each with their own indicator head. And a handheld radio,
handheld GPS....
IFR flying is all about having backups.
I get nervous if I am sitting there saying, "well, if THAT goes,
there's nothing I can do....

(PaulaJay1) wrote in message ...
In article , Peter
writes:

When the 430 was new, many people feared that kind of
integration of GPS, NAV and COMM, citing all sorts of reasons.


When the display on my 430 went out, the GPS, NAV AND COM were unusable.

Chuck

  #3  
Old March 3rd 04, 01:22 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Doug" wrote in message
om...
This is why I like my setup. A standalone IFR/GPS, and a standalone
NavCom, each with their own indicator head. And a handheld radio,
handheld GPS....
IFR flying is all about having backups.
I get nervous if I am sitting there saying, "well, if THAT goes,
there's nothing I can do....


If a wing falls off I'm okay because the airplane has two.


  #4  
Old March 3rd 04, 02:02 AM
John R. Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message =
...
=20
"Doug" wrote in message
om...
This is why I like my setup. A standalone IFR/GPS, and a standalone
NavCom, each with their own indicator head. And a handheld radio,
handheld GPS....
IFR flying is all about having backups.
I get nervous if I am sitting there saying, "well, if THAT goes,
there's nothing I can do....

=20
If a wing falls off I'm okay because the airplane has two.
=20
=20

And that's why I have three-bladed props. Two of them, in fact. :-\
---JRC---

  #5  
Old March 3rd 04, 04:28 AM
Doug Carter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2004-03-03, John R. Copeland wrote:

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ...

"Doug" wrote in message
om...
This is why I like my setup. A standalone IFR/GPS, and a standalone
NavCom, each with their own indicator head. And a handheld radio,
handheld GPS....
IFR flying is all about having backups.
I get nervous if I am sitting there saying, "well, if THAT goes,
there's nothing I can do....


If a wing falls off I'm okay because the airplane has two.


And that's why I have three-bladed props. Two of them, in fact. :-\
---JRC---

I've got four wings AND three blades... but only one vertical stab;
perhaps adapting a Connie tail...But then there's always the parachute!
  #6  
Old March 3rd 04, 07:52 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug,

I get nervous if I am sitting there saying, "well, if THAT goes,
there's nothing I can do....


Well, count the number of single-point failure modes your plan has -
and then stop flying, by that logic. There is no such thing as
zero-risk.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #7  
Old March 7th 04, 05:41 PM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...

Well, count the number of single-point failure modes your plan has -
and then stop flying, by that logic. There is no such thing as
zero-risk.


As long as the G1000 is backed up by a portable GPS and a vacuum AI, the
single-point failure risk is reduced to a reasonable level.

Again, the real risk is economic.... have you ever had to order a
dealer-only component on an electronically controlled automobile
transmission or engine? That should give you a sense of what G1000 owners
could face in 10 years.



--
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Garmin Specials ADV Michael Coates Home Built 0 March 18th 04 12:24 AM
Garmin fixes moving waypoint problem -- almost Jon Woellhaf Instrument Flight Rules 6 November 28th 03 05:29 PM
Garmin DME arc weidnress Dave Touretzky Instrument Flight Rules 5 October 2nd 03 02:04 AM
"Stand Alone" Boxes (Garmin 430) - Sole means of navigation - legal? Richard Instrument Flight Rules 20 September 30th 03 02:13 PM
Garmin 430/530 Questions Steve Coleman Instrument Flight Rules 16 August 28th 03 09:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.