![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Doe wrote:
Ok, I know this is one of those "it depends" answers, but I'm curious as to what folks are willing to do in the winter time. Assumptions: Single engine piston aircraft with NO de-icing equipment. Situation: It's wintertime. You want to fly XC and there are midlevel clouds in the forecast with the potential for icing to occur. It looks like the band is thin enough to climb through and cruise in the clear above the weather. SO: 1) If the cloud layer is forecast to potentially have icing, can you legally and would you climb through the layer to get up high for your trip? how thick a layer, type of forecast, time spent in the layer, etc. What would you be willing to risk transition through possible icing? I believe the recent interpretations is that this would be illegal as the cloud layer at below freezing temps would constitute an area of "known" icing and thus penetrating it would not be legal. As to what I would do personally ... well, I won't answer that here! :-) 2) Would that change any if those same conditions were now reported icing from a recent PIREP? It would change my personal view of the situation, but I don't think it changes the legality. 3) If it's reported, can you transit the cloud layer legally? I don't believe you can do so legally. 4) Let's say yoru trip starts off VFR but by the time you get to your destination, a cloud layer has formed that has reported icing in it. Can or or would you be willing to transit this layer to land at this destionation or would you turn around or divert to land someplace to stay out of the clouds? Again it depends, but if I had sufficient fuel, I'd probably divert. If I was low on fuel, I'd descend through the layer. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What if anything happens to the whole "known versus forecast" issue if there
is a pirep for "negative icing in clouds". "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... John Doe wrote: Ok, I know this is one of those "it depends" answers, but I'm curious as to what folks are willing to do in the winter time. Assumptions: Single engine piston aircraft with NO de-icing equipment. Situation: It's wintertime. You want to fly XC and there are midlevel clouds in the forecast with the potential for icing to occur. It looks like the band is thin enough to climb through and cruise in the clear above the weather. SO: 1) If the cloud layer is forecast to potentially have icing, can you legally and would you climb through the layer to get up high for your trip? how thick a layer, type of forecast, time spent in the layer, etc. What would you be willing to risk transition through possible icing? I believe the recent interpretations is that this would be illegal as the cloud layer at below freezing temps would constitute an area of "known" icing and thus penetrating it would not be legal. As to what I would do personally ... well, I won't answer that here! :-) 2) Would that change any if those same conditions were now reported icing from a recent PIREP? It would change my personal view of the situation, but I don't think it changes the legality. 3) If it's reported, can you transit the cloud layer legally? I don't believe you can do so legally. 4) Let's say yoru trip starts off VFR but by the time you get to your destination, a cloud layer has formed that has reported icing in it. Can or or would you be willing to transit this layer to land at this destionation or would you turn around or divert to land someplace to stay out of the clouds? Again it depends, but if I had sufficient fuel, I'd probably divert. If I was low on fuel, I'd descend through the layer. Matt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Under current FAA/NTSB rules, nothing, the forecast stands
until officially amended. The old joke, summer time forecast... Chance of severe thunderstorms and tornadoes along and 1,000 miles either side of a line from 150 miles south of Washington, DC to 300 miles north of San Francisco, CA. Tops to FL600. Winter forecast, same line from an unknown location to an unknown location, with this... Blizzard and whiteout conditions over the continent and coastal waters, chance of moderate to severe icing from the surface to FL240. The forecast calls "wolf" so many times that pilots and ground pounders became complacent. At least here in Kansas, the new standard for issuing a "severe thunderstorm warning" was changed for the 2005 season. They increased the size of the hailstones and the winds that trigger a warning so there would be fewer warnings. Since Kansas can have steady winds of 25 to 40 knots and higher gusts, without being associated with any storm, the severe T storm warning of gusts to 60 mph didn't really alert most locals. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "pgbnh" wrote in message . .. | What if anything happens to the whole "known versus forecast" issue if there | is a pirep for "negative icing in clouds". | "Matt Whiting" wrote in message | ... | John Doe wrote: | Ok, I know this is one of those "it depends" answers, but I'm curious as | to what folks are willing to do in the winter time. | | Assumptions: | | Single engine piston aircraft with NO de-icing equipment. | | Situation: | | It's wintertime. You want to fly XC and there are midlevel clouds in the | forecast with the potential for icing to occur. | | It looks like the band is thin enough to climb through and cruise in the | clear above the weather. | | SO: | | 1) If the cloud layer is forecast to potentially have icing, can you | legally and would you climb through the layer to get up high for your | trip? how thick a layer, type of forecast, time spent in the layer, etc. | What would you be willing to risk transition through possible icing? | | I believe the recent interpretations is that this would be illegal as the | cloud layer at below freezing temps would constitute an area of "known" | icing and thus penetrating it would not be legal. As to what I would do | personally ... well, I won't answer that here! :-) | | | 2) Would that change any if those same conditions were now reported icing | from a recent PIREP? | | It would change my personal view of the situation, but I don't think it | changes the legality. | | | 3) If it's reported, can you transit the cloud layer legally? | | I don't believe you can do so legally. | | | 4) Let's say yoru trip starts off VFR but by the time you get to your | destination, a cloud layer has formed that has reported icing in it. Can | or or would you be willing to transit this layer to land at this | destionation or would you turn around or divert to land someplace to stay | out of the clouds? | | Again it depends, but if I had sufficient fuel, I'd probably divert. If I | was low on fuel, I'd descend through the layer. | | Matt | | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Issues around de-ice on a 182 | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 87 | September 27th 05 11:46 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Have you ever... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 229 | May 6th 05 08:26 PM |
Known Icing requirements | Jeffrey Ross | Owning | 1 | November 20th 04 03:01 AM |
Wife agrees to go flying | Corky Scott | Piloting | 29 | October 2nd 03 06:55 PM |