![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charles Talleyrand wrote:
Suppose a smaller airplane with it's fly-by-wire controls goes runs out of fuel. All the engines quit. On a larger jet a ram air turbine would drop into the airstream and power the controls. How does it work on smaller planes like the Dassault Falcon or the F-16? The same way on a BAE Hawk. Alternatively, I've always wondered if one could not keep a special reserve tank for the APU. When the engines quit, the APU automatically starts to power the controls. Would such a system be safe and would it be certifiable? Would it weigh less than the existing system? Some years ago there was an Airbus A330 FBW fly by wire widebody that ran out of fuel crossing the atlantic. It had to make an emergency landing at (I thnk) the Azores I think from over 100km out without fuel. A leaking fuel delivery pipe in the engine pylon drained the aircrafts fuel: the pilot didn't believe his instruments and thus kept transfering fuel from the good side to the bad side rather than shutdown the bad engine. He thus drained both wings. When fuel cut out (I saw a dramatisation ogf the events) the ram air turbine deployed and the pilots, after finally acknowledging their fuel situation went through their checklist. Lights and pressurisation was lost with the power. Most pointedly they lost spoilers and flaps; they really only had a few instruments, ailerons, tail surfaces and the undercarriage. As a result of being without flaps the landing speed was very high and becuase there were no spoilers they couldn't loose speed or altitude and actually had to circle and zig zag to loose both speed an altitude. This made the one chance of making the runway even harder as there would be no go arounds. To cap it all of the runway in the azores ends in a 300ft shear cliff. They stopped a few dozen meters short with blown tyres. Airbus changed their software and though the pilot was clearly not making the best decisions that day it was easier to given him awards. The ram air turbine provides very little power. I think the idea of giving the APU its own reserve fuel supply is tempered by the fact that it is perhaps better to keep the engine lit for a few seconds longer. Perhaps a cartriedge or two of of rocket-gas generator turbine could be used to provide pressure for flap and spoiler deployment |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Thunderstorm - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 2nd 05 11:05 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |