A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fly-By-Wire Flight Controls



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 17th 05, 03:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fly-By-Wire Flight Controls

Eunometic schrieb:

Eunometic schrieb:
It does apply for the PA200 Tornado. The APU is not operable in-flight,
if you loose both engines and the one-shot battery is down you have to
get out of that thing...



I didn't think Tornado was fully FBW?


The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup system...

Benjamin

  #2  
Old December 17th 05, 04:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fly-By-Wire Flight Controls


Benjamin Gawert wrote:
Eunometic schrieb:

Eunometic schrieb:
It does apply for the PA200 Tornado. The APU is not operable in-flight,
if you loose both engines and the one-shot battery is down you have to
get out of that thing...



I didn't think Tornado was fully FBW?


The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup system...

Benjamin


Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn?

  #3  
Old December 18th 05, 02:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fly-By-Wire Flight Controls

Eunometic schrieb:

The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup system...

Benjamin



Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn?


Because besides power for certain important instruments and the radio
the EPS battery also powers an electric motor that powers a hydraulic pump.

"Mechanical linkage" does not mean that the stick is connected to
pushrods and levers that move the control surfaces (which would be silly
on a fighter/bomber aircraft with up to ~55000 pounds weight). When in
so-called "mech mode" the stick is connected to several hydraulic valves
that control the hydraulic actuators. So you need hydraulics pressure,
and in cases of double engine out this hydraulic pressure comes from an
electric pump that powered by the EPS battery.

In normal operation the potentiometers connected to the stick submit
stick position data to the flight control system (CSAS and SPILS) which
calculate the necessary control surface deflection and control the
corresponding actuators. The mechanical linkage is inactive (in
emergencies the stick gets linked to the mechanical controls through a
honeycomb block which gets squeezed by the stick movement applied by the
panicing pilot ;-)

This applies to the GR versions (bomber), I don't know if the F versions
are somewhat different.

Benjamin
  #4  
Old December 19th 05, 02:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fly-By-Wire Flight Controls


Benjamin Gawert wrote:
Eunometic schrieb:

The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup system...

Benjamin



Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn?


Because besides power for certain important instruments and the radio
the EPS battery also powers an electric motor that powers a hydraulic pump.

"Mechanical linkage" does not mean that the stick is connected to
pushrods and levers that move the control surfaces (which would be silly
on a fighter/bomber aircraft with up to ~55000 pounds weight).


Which means that PA200 Tornado when using 'mechanical' backup is
actually fully power opperated as opposed to power assisted (power
assisted can be designed to connect into a fully manual system with
limited movement). Given the need for power it doesn't seem to make
much sense to bother to use a mechanical system at all. An additional
layer of redundancy and an 'analog' backup would be better use of the
weight. Perhaps Panavia was worried about Electromagnetic Pulse or
Weapons. I believe F-16 uses fiber optics.

When in
so-called "mech mode" the stick is connected to several hydraulic valves
that control the hydraulic actuators. So you need hydraulics pressure,
and in cases of double engine out this hydraulic pressure comes from an
electric pump that powered by the EPS battery.

In normal operation the potentiometers connected to the stick submit
stick position data to the flight control system (CSAS and SPILS) which
calculate the necessary control surface deflection and control the
corresponding actuators.


They use potentiometers? I though LVDT were normally used.

The mechanical linkage is inactive (in
emergencies the stick gets linked to the mechanical controls through a
honeycomb block which gets squeezed by the stick movement applied by the
panicing pilot ;-)

This applies to the GR versions (bomber), I don't know if the F versions
are somewhat different.

Benjamin


  #5  
Old December 19th 05, 06:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fly-By-Wire Flight Controls

Eunometic schrieb:

"Mechanical linkage" does not mean that the stick is connected to
pushrods and levers that move the control surfaces (which would be silly
on a fighter/bomber aircraft with up to ~55000 pounds weight).



Which means that PA200 Tornado when using 'mechanical' backup is
actually fully power opperated as opposed to power assisted (power
assisted can be designed to connect into a fully manual system with
limited movement).


correct.

Given the need for power it doesn't seem to make
much sense to bother to use a mechanical system at all.


The mechanical linkage backup is there if the 2x redundant fly-by-wire
system fails or gets damaged. When in "mech mode" (FBW dead but engines
are running) the aircraft is fully controllable (but of course reacts
more sensible due to the lack of CSAS and also lacks things like spin
prevention and AOA limiter etc). Loosing the FBW does not mean the
aircraft can't return safely...

An additional
layer of redundancy and an 'analog' backup would be better use of the
weight. Perhaps Panavia was worried about Electromagnetic Pulse or
Weapons.


Correct. Thanks to the mechanical linkage the aircraft is still operable
even when suffering from an EMP or with a damaged electronics system.
Even 4x redundant FBW wouldn't provide this safety, and the weight
penalty isn't really big.

I believe F-16 uses fiber optics.


The Eurofighter Typhoon uses fiber optics. The F-16 used a wire harness
(don't know if that has been changed in a later block but I doubt that).

In normal operation the potentiometers connected to the stick submit
stick position data to the flight control system (CSAS and SPILS) which
calculate the necessary control surface deflection and control the
corresponding actuators.



They use potentiometers? I though LVDT were normally used.


No, it's some sort of potentiometer, but of course a bit more
sophisticated than what you can find in consumer electronics ;-)

Benjamin
  #6  
Old December 20th 05, 12:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fly-By-Wire Flight Controls

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:59:21 +0100, Benjamin Gawert
wrote:

Eunometic schrieb:

"Mechanical linkage" does not mean that the stick is connected to
pushrods and levers that move the control surfaces (which would be silly
on a fighter/bomber aircraft with up to ~55000 pounds weight).



Which means that PA200 Tornado when using 'mechanical' backup is
actually fully power opperated as opposed to power assisted (power
assisted can be designed to connect into a fully manual system with
limited movement).


correct.

Given the need for power it doesn't seem to make
much sense to bother to use a mechanical system at all.


The mechanical linkage backup is there if the 2x redundant fly-by-wire
system fails or gets damaged. When in "mech mode" (FBW dead but engines
are running) the aircraft is fully controllable (but of course reacts
more sensible due to the lack of CSAS and also lacks things like spin
prevention and AOA limiter etc). Loosing the FBW does not mean the
aircraft can't return safely...


Hmm sounds sensible in a Cold War environment with buckets of canned
sunshine being thrown around.

But now a question to pilots or folks in the know:
Do they train flying "mech mode" and if so how?
Just in the sims or sometimes for real as in.
"IP to student: I flipped the switch to mech mode. Show me how you
smooth you can land this baby"?

And if a pilot can apparently fly safe in "mech mode" does that mean
that the Tornado is not inherent unstable like the F16? Or at least
not very inherent unstable?

Because flying a F16 in "mech mode" (if that beast would exist) THAT
would be a real challange.

Greetz Mu




Greetz Mu


  #7  
Old December 20th 05, 12:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fly-By-Wire Flight Controls

Mu schrieb:

Hmm sounds sensible in a Cold War environment with buckets of canned
sunshine being thrown around.


Well, the PA200 is a aircraft from the cold war aera...

But now a question to pilots or folks in the know:
Do they train flying "mech mode" and if so how?
Just in the sims or sometimes for real as in.
"IP to student: I flipped the switch to mech mode. Show me how you
smooth you can land this baby"?


No real training in mech mode (mech mode is an emergency system and not
selectable by a switch, and having it activated once means that after
the aircraft is back on the ground it has to go to service for having
the honeycomb package replaced). You can train that in the simulator,
but usually there is no special training for flying in mech mode...

And if a pilot can apparently fly safe in "mech mode" does that mean
that the Tornado is not inherent unstable like the F16? Or at least
not very inherent unstable?


No, it's not. The PA200 is a very stable aircraft, there are no real
surprises for the pilot when in mech mode. There is a little yaw
tendency that gets suppressed by the yaw damper in CSAS and that shows
up in mech mode, and you loose functions like auto rudder or SPILS (spin
preventer/AOA limiter), stick feel simulation and such. Nothing which is
really a problem for emergency operation...

Benjamin
  #8  
Old December 19th 05, 06:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fly-By-Wire Flight Controls


"Eunometic" wrote in message
oups.com...

Benjamin Gawert wrote:
Eunometic schrieb:

Eunometic schrieb:
It does apply for the PA200 Tornado. The APU is not operable

in-flight,
if you loose both engines and the one-shot battery is down you have to
get out of that thing...


I didn't think Tornado was fully FBW?


The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup

system...

Benjamin


Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn?

The One Shot Battery is there to provide electrical power to a Fuel pump (or
in combination with a Hyd pump). The engines also need electrical power to
keep their systems running - without electrics, the engines will "run
away" - Very bad thing if you're not near a nice big bit of tarmac......


  #9  
Old December 20th 05, 01:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fly-By-Wire Flight Controls

Ian wrote:
"Eunometic" wrote in message
oups.com...

Benjamin Gawert wrote:

Eunometic schrieb:


Eunometic schrieb:
It does apply for the PA200 Tornado. The APU is not operable


in-flight,

if you loose both engines and the one-shot battery is down you have to
get out of that thing...


I didn't think Tornado was fully FBW?

The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup


system...

Benjamin


Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn?


The One Shot Battery is there to provide electrical power to a Fuel pump (or
in combination with a Hyd pump). The engines also need electrical power to
keep their systems running - without electrics, the engines will "run
away" - Very bad thing if you're not near a nice big bit of tarmac......


Or, more importantly, a runway. They tend to be made of concrete not
asphalt.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #10  
Old December 17th 05, 04:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fly-By-Wire Flight Controls


Benjamin Gawert wrote:
Eunometic schrieb:

Eunometic schrieb:
It does apply for the PA200 Tornado. The APU is not operable in-flight,
if you loose both engines and the one-shot battery is down you have to
get out of that thing...



I didn't think Tornado was fully FBW?


The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup system...

Benjamin


Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
NTSB: USAF included? Larry Dighera Piloting 10 September 11th 05 10:33 AM
Thunderstorm - Ron Knott Greasy Rider© @invalid.com Naval Aviation 0 June 2nd 05 11:05 PM
PC flight simulators Bjørnar Bolsøy Military Aviation 178 December 14th 03 12:14 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.