Bad medical examiner postcript

Robert M. Gary wrote:
Congressman?

A powerless one. DC gets a non-voting observer in congress.
Essentially she can stand up and make speeches and otherwise
participate in hearings but otherwise is powerless.

Not only is DC taxed without real representation, they also
have to deal with incessent federal tinkering in their local
affairs that would be unconstitutional if they were a state.

And DC residents lost their Second Amendment rights and the
right to lawful self-defense about 30 years ago.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm



--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
Merry Christmas
Have a Safe and Happy New Year
Live Long and Prosper
Jim Macklin
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...
| Robert M. Gary wrote:
| Congressman?
|
| A powerless one. DC gets a non-voting observer in
congress.
| Essentially she can stand up and make speeches and
otherwise
| participate in hearings but otherwise is powerless.
|
| Not only is DC taxed without real representation, they
also
| have to deal with incessent federal tinkering in their
local
| affairs that would be unconstitutional if they were a
state.

All:

Got some good news when I spoke to the FAA today. Based apparently on
the letter from my primary physician that the ADD diagnosis did not
exist in 1965, and noting my educational, professional, and flight
training history, the FAA has reinstated my medical. They said they'd
send out the certificate this week or next, given the holiday.

I'm still upset at the AME, who pulled the trigger on this based on
almost zero facts and did not offer any guidance in getting a
determination of whether I was really qualified to fly. However, I
have to hand it to the FAA for making a relatively quick determination
based on the additional information -- I think they deserve credit for
that.

Thanks, everyone, for the supportive comments.

Wiz

Based apparently on
the letter from my primary physician [...] the FAA has reinstated my medical.

Great! And I'm always glad to hear stories of how the FAA operates in
our interests rather than against us as a big bureaucracy.

Jose
--
You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Wiz"
Got some good news when I spoke to the FAA today. Based apparently on
the letter from my primary physician that the ADD diagnosis did not
exist in 1965,

That is awesome! ...sometimes the good guy wins.

But, your experience has shown how broken parts of the system are. You
mentioned the protocol for a battery of tests the FAA wanted performed by a
psychologist or psychiatrist for a diagnosis of ADD which include an IQ
test, Rorschach (inkblot) test and depression screening.

Does the FAA think that ADD is a form of mental retardation? I wonder if
they would be surprised to find out that ADD has no relationship to IQ. It
makes you wonder how they come up with this stuff.


Dallas

On 22 Dec 2005 10:44:24 -0800, "Wiz" wrote:

All:

Got some good news when I spoke to the FAA today. Based apparently on
the letter from my primary physician that the ADD diagnosis did not
exist in 1965, and noting my educational, professional, and flight
training history, the FAA has reinstated my medical. They said they'd
send out the certificate this week or next, given the holiday.

Congratulations! I'm glad to hear it all worked out in the end.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com


I'm still upset at the AME, who pulled the trigger on this based on
almost zero facts and did not offer any guidance in getting a
determination of whether I was really qualified to fly. However, I
have to hand it to the FAA for making a relatively quick determination
based on the additional information -- I think they deserve credit for
that.

Thanks, everyone, for the supportive comments.

Wiz

"Wiz" wrote

the FAA has reinstated my medical. They said they'd
send out the certificate this week or next, given the holiday.

I'm still upset at the AME, who pulled the trigger on this based on
almost zero facts

I've got to wonder if this wasn't a little "payback" for you getting mad
because they messed up with your medical numbers, in the first place. Wrong
in any case, but I have to wonder.
--
Jim in NC

"Wiz"
I'm still upset at the AME, who pulled the trigger on this based on
almost zero facts

Hey Wiz.. how did he even get a report from your doctor with the mention of
ADD on it, I thought he wanted more info on the BP meds?



Dallas

Dallas:

The protocol for approval if you take blood pressure medication
requires documentation of three normal BP readings in your MD's office
over a period of time. My MD faxed the office notes for that period
with the BP readings on them (guess he could have sent a letter with
the BP readings, but I didn't know he was going to do it that way).
The notation for one day said "BP xxx/xx, ADD, tendonitis (r) wrist."

Wiz
--------
Dallas wrote:

Hey Wiz.. how did he even get a report from your doctor with the
mention of
ADD on it, I thought he wanted more info on the BP meds?

Dallas

On 22 Dec 2005 10:44:24 -0800, "Wiz" wrote in
.com::


I'm still upset at the AME, who pulled the trigger on this based on
almost zero facts and did not offer any guidance in getting a
determination of whether I was really qualified to fly. However, I
have to hand it to the FAA for making a relatively quick determination
based on the additional information -- I think they deserve credit for
that.

Did the AME violate anything in here?:
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...TOKEN=37551028

To see how the FAA expects AMEs to think, peruse the Federal Air
Surgeon's Medical Bulletin:
http://www.faa.gov/library/reports/medical/fasmb/

I found this issue interesting:
http://www.faa.gov/library/reports/m...ia/F2004_3.pdf