![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:39:52 GMT, "Bob Gardner"
wrote: Frequencies, courses, altitudes, and the miss procedure are enough. Yes, but FCAM doesn't make for a good mnemonic. ;] Hmm... come to think of it, it's better than most. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How much protection on approach? | Michael | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | January 15th 04 05:58 PM |
DME req'd on ILS (not ILS-DME) approach? | Don Faulkner | Instrument Flight Rules | 13 | October 7th 03 03:54 AM |
Approach plate | Hankal | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 2nd 03 07:31 PM |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |