![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Hilton" wrote in message ink.net... No, but were instrument rated and it was a Commander. It may have been a legality issue (currency etc) that cause them to go VFR, I don't know. Doesn't sound like they were too concerned about legalities. Scud running all the way from RHV along Hwy 101 below 500' would surely run afoul of FAR 91.119. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:31:05 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: "Hilton" wrote in message link.net... No, but were instrument rated and it was a Commander. It may have been a legality issue (currency etc) that cause them to go VFR, I don't know. Doesn't sound like they were too concerned about legalities. Scud running all the way from RHV along Hwy 101 below 500' would surely run afoul of FAR 91.119. I'm confused. Was that how they originally got to South County Airport? (Q99) Q99 was the departure point immediately before the crash, and the crash scene (going by a map in the newspaper) was 2 miles away, into rising terrain, more or less along a crosswind departure leg, assuming a takeoff to the south. That'd be orthogonal to 101. The accident report says the departure point was "Santa Clara," but that's just part of Q99's full name. I apologize if I'm trying to teach my grandma to suck eggs here. Don |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Tuite wrote:
I'm confused. Was that how they originally got to South County Airport? (Q99) your charts aren't up to date!.. it is now called E16. --Sylvain |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don Tuite" wrote in message news ![]() I'm confused. Was that how they originally got to South County Airport? (Q99) Q99 was the departure point immediately before the crash, and the crash scene (going by a map in the newspaper) was 2 miles away, into rising terrain, more or less along a crosswind departure leg, assuming a takeoff to the south. That'd be orthogonal to 101. The accident report says the departure point was "Santa Clara," but that's just part of Q99's full name. I apologize if I'm trying to teach my grandma to suck eggs here. From Hilton's message: "A couple of years ago, a CFI and Commercial student hit the hills in similar conditions although it was day time. Scud ran all the way from RHV along Hwy 101 below 500' in a Commander and then ran into the hills when they tried to get through next to the reservoir near Hollister (heading into the valley)." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:05:39 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: From Hilton's message: "A couple of years ago, a CFI and Commercial student hit the hills in similar conditions although it was day time. Scud ran all the way from RHV along Hwy 101 below 500' in a Commander and then ran into the hills when they tried to get through next to the reservoir near Hollister (heading into the valley)." Oh. Getting old. That's why I apologize in advance these days. Don |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Tuite wrote:
I'm confused. Was that how they originally got to South County Airport? (Q99) Q99 was the departure point immediately before the crash, and the crash scene (going by a map in the newspaper) was 2 miles away, into rising terrain, more or less along a crosswind departure leg, assuming a takeoff to the south. That'd be orthogonal to 101. The accident report says the departure point was "Santa Clara," but that's just part of Q99's full name. Don, the info I gave above pertained to a different accident that occured in 2003; aircraft departed RHV. The most-recent accident did depart Q99 (now E16). Sorry for the confusion, but someone asked me for more info on the 2003 Commander accident. Hilton |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
Hilton wrote: No, but were instrument rated and it was a Commander. It may have been a legality issue (currency etc) that cause them to go VFR, I don't know. Doesn't sound like they were too concerned about legalities. Scud running all the way from RHV along Hwy 101 below 500' would surely run afoul of FAR 91.119. I'm still not sure why they felt scud-running all the way down 101 to the reservoir, then flying into higher terrain was safer than a 30 second IFR climb though the layer. The obvious options a 1. Neither was current 2. Aircraft wasn't legal IFR 3. Major delay getting out of RHV (SJC traffic does cause a delay) Note: This refers to the 2003 accident. Hilton |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aircraft Spruce: Abused Customers and Fourteen More Angry Comments -- More to Come | jls | Home Built | 2 | February 6th 05 08:32 AM |
If true, this makes me really angry (Buzzing Pilot kills 9 year-old son) | Hilton | Piloting | 2 | November 29th 04 05:02 AM |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |
JEWS AND THE WHITE SLAVE TRADE | B2431 | Military Aviation | 16 | March 1st 04 11:04 PM |
Enemies Of Everyone | Grantland | Military Aviation | 5 | September 16th 03 12:55 PM |