A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RNP demo at DCA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old December 24th 05, 02:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RNP demo at DCA

Bob Noel wrote:
In article xdcrf.15668$LB5.8651@fed1read04, wrote:


I have serious doubt that the U.S. airlines will ever retrofit their
legacy glass aircraft. Boeing wants a king's ransom to do that. The
757/767 fleet manager at American said, "No way, it would cost as over
$100 million."



what am I missing here... American's 757/767 fleet has what kind of
glass? Is the architecture so tightly integrated that processors and software
can't be upgraded (even as part of tech refresh)? Is there additional
equipment that needs to be added? How many aircraft?


Any of their 757s/767s delivered after some date (circa 1995?) have the
required stuff. That is when Boeing switched to GPS as the primary
sensor and the Pegasus FMS. These birds can do true RNP and
radius-to-a-fix legs (RF legs).

American's fleet is capable of RNP-2, isn't it? If not, then they should
be looking at some upgrade cost anyway.


RNP 2 is not much of anything, and can be done with DME/DME in the en
route environment. Containment areas for RNP 2.0 is 4 miles, centerline
to edge, no different than a VOR airway. For RNAV departures the term
of reference in FAA-dom is Level 1 (RNP 1.0) and Level 2 (RNP 2.0)
Level 2 accomplishes little, if anything.

To get into the performance-based approach game, RNP 0.3 is required
just to enter the game. RNP 0.1 is where it all is going, and that
simply will not happen with the 757/767 pre-Pegasus avionics. The
hardware is too old and rigid. They would have to rip out the old FMSes
and replace them.

To get down to RNP 0.1 you need some pretty nifty software routines that
will compute and estimate ANP (acutal navigation performance), you need
redundancy to achieve an E10-7 target level of safety, you need the
latest EGPWS (TAWS) with peaks and obstacles, and you almost certainly
need at least one IRU. With three IRUs that are updated by dual,
independent GPS sensors, and two (better three) independent FMSes, you
have the absolutely best performing platform.

When you are threading between the rocks at RNP 0.10 and possibly lose
GPS, you don't want to be DEAD reckoning. ;-)

(btw - $100 million? feh - you don't want to know the cost to upgrade
the USAF fleet...)


The Air Force has the necessary eqippage in some of the new stuff. I
doubt they will be doing much retrofitting of avionics except for
special-use aircraft.

  #7  
Old December 25th 05, 12:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RNP demo at DCA

Bob Noel wrote:

Not a lot of USAF aircraft have RNP capabilities (especially RNP-1, RNP-0.3,
and RNP-0.1) yet. Perhaps the LTC was talking about present equippage
or very near-term.

C-5, KC-135, C-17 are all getting RNP capabilities.

C-130 development program for CNS/ATM, to include, RNP-4 and below,
has been delayed.

E-3 and E-8 will likely be upgraded


I was told by one of the avionics gurus I work with that the new
fighter, F-22 is it?...will do the full nine-yards, right out of the
box. I think that means autoflight roll-steering, RF legs, Baro VNAV,
and all the necessary redundancies to do the most demanding RNP approach
procedures.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.