Angry

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

Right. But there are other portions of what you wrote above that are
also not enclosed in quotation marks, however you imply you didn't
write them.


Did I? How did I imply that?



Who wrote the text that isn't enclosed in quotations
marks other than the first sentence?


Me.



The quotation marks only enclose what Clinton said, apparently.


The quotation marks enclosed a question directed at Clinton and his
response.



The
quotation you cited is not set within quotation marks or otherwise
indicated to be other than your words.


Better look again.



I have not implied that you should do that.


Yes you have.



How did you manage to
infer such an inane notion from what I wrote?


Because that is what is implied by you wrote.



What makes you think I didn't?


You're right. I may have simply overestimated your intelligence.



It wasn't.


But it should have been.



Please provide the Message-ID of the article in this thread that
mentions the "articles of impeachment." I don't recall seeing that
phrase in this thread at all.


"Tien Dao" wrote in message
.. .

You can stop your pedantic antics. No previous super-power leader should
be so humiliated as Clinton and by his own people least of all.


Clinton's humiliation, if he actually felt any humiliation, was his own
doing.



Really? It "belongs" to the "people" as much as the Constitution, the
Senate and the House? I guess you can just drop in any time for a cup of
tea
since it really "belongs" to you? )) The guy's the world's leader. He
can do
whatever he wants in that office!! Yah, so he lied about a blow job. Big
deal? All lies great and small are equally impeachable? You guys think
it is as important a lie as covering up for breaking into Watergate?


Clinton lied under oath.

"Tom Conner" wrote in message
ink.net...

Isn't Steven the same guy who lifted an entire article from Snopes.com and
didn't quote it, thus implying he wrote it?


Steven didn't do that.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
. net...

"Tom Conner" wrote in message
ink.net...

Isn't Steven the same guy who lifted an entire article from Snopes.com
and
didn't quote it, thus implying he wrote it?


Steven didn't do that.



Apparently, Clinton isn't the only liar.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...a 0405a0b0858

Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting
From: "Steven P. McNicoll" - Find messages by
this author
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:34:38 GMT
Local: Wed, Dec 7 2005 12:34 pm
Subject: Easy Eddie
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse


Some parts of this glurge about Edgar Joseph "Easy Eddie" O'Hare (also known
as EJ) and his son, Edward Henry "Butch" O'Hare, are true, if exaggerated in
the presentation above. The senior O'Hare provided legal services to Al
Capone and later helped the government bring that.........

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
Clinton lied repeatedly under oath.

how many people died as a consequence?

--Sylvain

In article , Sylvain
wrote:

Clinton lied repeatedly under oath.

how many people died as a consequence?

This is relevant how?

--
Bob Noel
New NHL? what a joke

"Sylvain" wrote in message
...
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
Clinton lied repeatedly under oath.

how many people died as a consequence?

--Sylvain

Not that I agree with such a narrow view of the war and our reasons for
being there but are you saying that it's OK for our president to lie to us
as long as no one dies as a result?

Sylvain wrote:
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

Clinton lied repeatedly under oath.


how many people died as a consequence?

He was impeached, not tried for murder. What is your point?

Matt

How do you sample a counter with the total vote cast for a candidate?

"Jose" wrote in message
m...
You count a sample of 20 paper receipts and Al is ahead 15 to 5.
Other than Al won the sample, you have learned absolutely nothing
about the correctness of the total vote.

Right. Then you compare the paper sample to the electronic sample and
find that Al is ahead 12-8 in the electronic sample. You now know,
which you didn't before, that the voting is rigged (or busted). Had
the tallys matched, you would have more confidence than before that
the voting was fairly counted electronically, and could trust the
other electronic tallys.

Jose
--
You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

lynn wrote:

You really should use an alias. It took less than 10 seconds to narrow
your address down to three possibilites in WI & one in MD.

So? I used to post my N number. Anyone could look up my address. "Yea though I
walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil. 'Cause I'm
the meanest MoFo in the valley."

John may feel that he has nothing to fear if people know who he is.

George Patterson
Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to
your slightly older self.

How do you sample a counter with the total vote cast for a candidate?

You don't. You sample the votes to see if they agree. That is, you
compare the electronically reported tally of a set of voting machines
with the mechanical (paper?) ballots corresponding to that same set of
voting machines. It doesn't matter who is ahead or behind, just that
the paper and electronic ones match.

If they don't match, something's wrong.

Jose
--
You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.