![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bought a homebuilt once. Both radio antennas had been installed the same
way - with the cardboard drilling pattern glued to the aluminum - then left there, and the antenna installed over the top of it. No ground plane. The SWR was OK (1.8:1), believe it or not. It worked out to 10 miles or so - then things started getting weak and scratchy. Even a fancy Anritsu test set I borrowed from work showed no great problem. But when I removed those drill patterns, things started working fine. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bought a homebuilt once. Both radio antennas had been installed the same
way - with the cardboard drilling pattern glued to the aluminum - then left there, and the antenna installed over the top of it. No ground plane. The SWR was OK (1.8:1), believe it or not. It worked out to 10 miles or so - then things started getting weak and scratchy. Both radios are mounted to aluminum rails bolted to fuselage longerons however each radio has an aditional grounding wire (from it's main plug) to fuselage as a precaution. The SWRs also check out the same as you discribe as does the performance. Power output does not seem to be the issue (again I never checked power output in the winter), just audio quality. Jim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is not the RADIO ground that was needed, it was the GROUND PLANE that is
needed on a 1/4 wave antenna. http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/~pedrow/classes/ee416/Spring_2004/share_pdfs/teals/April_4/Quarterwavemonopoles1.pdf#search='quarter%20dipole ' You must have the outer conductor of the coaxial cable connected either to a lot of metal at more or less 90 degrees to the vertical, or you have to get scientific with 3 or more tuned stubs. This has little to do with the radio's electrical ground. The link explains what's going on pretty well. You should be ok with an aluminum RV as long as the coax outer conductor to the skin reads a short on an ohmmeter. Both radios are mounted to aluminum rails bolted to fuselage longerons however each radio has an aditional grounding wire (from it's main plug) to fuselage as a precaution. The SWRs also check out the same as you discribe as does the performance. Jim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's not a good way to measure whether or not the coax is terminated
properly. I just inspected an antique where the antenna was properly mounted on a sufficiently big ground plane, but the coax braid wasn't even connected to the ground plane at the antenna end. You might just a well have run Romex as coax if that's the case. And, of course, there WAS continuity to ground as the coax WAS terminated at the radio end to the airframe. THe question was whether BOTH antennas or coax could be "bad". I can argue that if the fellow who made the plane didn't know how to assemble a connector properly the odds of him screwing up BOTH the coax cables in the same way are quite good. THere is no substitute for a good mechanical inspection of the coax connections at both the radio AND antenna ends. I didn't notice whether or not the OP said that he borrowed a known good headset, since that's the one thing that is common to both rigs. Jim You should be ok with an aluminum RV as long as the coax outer conductor to the skin reads a short on an ohmmeter. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I didn't notice whether or not the OP said that he borrowed a known good
headset, since that's the one thing that is common to both rigs. Several headsets were tried with same results. Both these headsets worked fine in wife's C-172 (ATC reports crystal clear) One of the radios has a new store bought antenna on the belly with new BNC connectors that came on a "factory built" length of coax to the radio which came with an antenna "pigtail" already on the tray. This complete replacement setup seems to xmit no better than the "cheesey" antenna and antique radio it replaced and is reportedly no different than the 2nd radio/antenna setup. Jim |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Try this description one more time, please. I"m not understanding why a
factory built length of coax with BNC connectors can have pigtails. Jim wrote in message oups.com... One of the radios has a new store bought antenna on the belly with new BNC connectors that came on a "factory built" length of coax to the radio which came with an antenna "pigtail" already on the tray. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Try this description one more time, please. I"m not understanding why a
factory built length of coax with BNC connectors can have pigtails. Jim (...radio which came with an antenna "pigtail" already on the tray) RADIO which came with an antenna "pigtail" already on the TRAY Thats "pigtail" on TRAY not on coax from antenna. And before I get chastised again I realize that the term "pigtail" may not be technically correct but I think most will get the picture here. Jim |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MX385 Radio removal | Marty from Florida | Owning | 3 | May 24th 13 08:26 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
1944 Aerial War Comes to Life in Radio Play | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 25th 04 10:57 PM |
Ham Radio In The Airplane | Cy Galley | Owning | 23 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |