![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Gaquin" wrote in message . .. "Ramapriya" wrote in message Have anyone of you had a problem with the accents of various ATC chaps around the world? Is this a trivial problem, considering the standard phraseology in use in ATC communications, or can it lead to something worse? The myriad accents are exactly why standardized phraseology is important in international ops. I personally think a lot of folks get overly anal about it in domestic use, but that's just my opinion. But US domestic ops are International ops for many. The French have the same problem. Use French with the French even at CDG. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris" wrote in message But US domestic ops are International ops for many. The French have the same problem. Use French with the French even at CDG. Yes, you're right. Perhaps I didn't make myself clear enough. "Domestic" ops at Kennedy or Dulles or a host of others are, as you say, truly international, and should be treated as such. But I was referring to [and here I place the caveat that I haven't flown anything anywhere in almost 10 years - I'm going by what I read on this NG and others] posters I read here and elsewhere who rail on adamantly insisting on standardized phraseology at airports that are 99% local traffic 99% of the time. I simply don't think its worth getting crazy over in that environment. Takes some of the fun away, in my view. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|