A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 3rd 06, 04:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine

"Mike Schumann" wrote in message
ink.net...
I have 0 sympathy for either of these guys. Since when is a GPS required
for VFR navigation? What happened to learning how to read a map and
looking out the window?


You have zero sympathy for the student-pilot passenger who hadn't even begun
his cross-country flight-training yet? What sort of navigational
responsibility do you expect such a passenger to bear? (The FAA, of course,
found him to be blameless.)

--Gary


  #2  
Old January 4th 06, 12:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine

Obviously the pilot is the one responsible. But you would think that a
stundent pilot with 30 hours, particularly one who is going along to get
cross country experience would have a little better grasp of map reading and
basic navigation.

Mike Schumann

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
. ..
"Mike Schumann" wrote in message
ink.net...
I have 0 sympathy for either of these guys. Since when is a GPS required
for VFR navigation? What happened to learning how to read a map and
looking out the window?


You have zero sympathy for the student-pilot passenger who hadn't even
begun his cross-country flight-training yet? What sort of navigational
responsibility do you expect such a passenger to bear? (The FAA, of
course, found him to be blameless.)

--Gary




  #3  
Old January 4th 06, 01:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine

On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:54:30 GMT, "Mike Schumann"
wrote in
et::

Obviously the pilot is the one responsible.


Actually, I would place some culpability on the FBO (presumably) that
rented the PIC the aircraft. However, that in no way diminishes the
multiple transgressions of the PIC.
  #4  
Old January 4th 06, 01:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine

Actually, I would place some culpability on the FBO (presumably) that
rented the PIC the aircraft.


Why?

How much nanny do you want in life?

Jose
--
You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #5  
Old January 4th 06, 08:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine

On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 01:37:29 GMT, Jose
wrote in : :


Actually, I would place some culpability on the FBO (presumably) that
rented the PIC the aircraft.


Why?


Because in my experience the FBO's insurance requires a current
medical certificate and BFR for coverage.
  #6  
Old January 4th 06, 02:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine

Because in my experience the FBO's insurance requires a current
medical certificate and BFR for coverage.


That may let the insurance company off the hook (though maybe not).
However, how does that place -blame- on the FBO?

Jose
--
You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #7  
Old January 4th 06, 03:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine

On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:42:57 GMT, Jose
wrote in : :

Because in my experience the FBO's insurance requires a current
medical certificate and BFR for coverage.


That may let the insurance company off the hook (though maybe not).
However, how does that place -blame- on the FBO?


Apparently, the matter is moot in this instance, as others have
reported the PIC did not rent the aircraft.

However, renting an aircraft to an unqualified pilot would seem
irresponsible.

  #8  
Old January 4th 06, 01:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message ...
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:54:30 GMT, "Mike Schumann"
wrote in
et::

Obviously the pilot is the one responsible.


Actually, I would place some culpability on the FBO (presumably) that
rented the PIC the aircraft. However, that in no way diminishes the
multiple transgressions of the PIC.



Sheaffer owned a share in the C-150, no mention of an FBO....
--
Dan DeVillers
http://www.ameritech.net/users/ddevillers/start.html


..


  #9  
Old January 4th 06, 03:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine



Larry Dighera wrote:

On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:54:30 GMT, "Mike Schumann"
wrote in
et::


Obviously the pilot is the one responsible.



Actually, I would place some culpability on the FBO (presumably) that
rented the PIC the aircraft. However, that in no way diminishes the
multiple transgressions of the PIC.


He was part owner of the aircraft.

  #10  
Old January 4th 06, 02:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine

"Mike Schumann" wrote in message
nk.net...
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
. ..
"Mike Schumann" wrote in message
ink.net...
I have 0 sympathy for either of these guys. Since when is a GPS
required for VFR navigation? What happened to learning how to read a
map and looking out the window?


You have zero sympathy for the student-pilot passenger who hadn't even
begun his cross-country flight-training yet? What sort of navigational
responsibility do you expect such a passenger to bear? (The FAA, of
course, found him to be blameless.)

Obviously the pilot is the one responsible. But you would think that a
stundent pilot with 30 hours, particularly one who is going along to get
cross country experience would have a little better grasp of map reading
and basic navigation.


His number of hours tells you nothing useful; different students can be at
very different points in their training at the same number of hours. What's
relevant is that this particular student had not yet had any cross-country
training. Why would you expect a student at that stage to already be
competent to read charts and navigate?

--Gary


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Another ADIZ violation? Dan Foster Piloting 5 January 4th 06 02:25 AM
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? Tim Epstein Piloting 7 August 4th 05 05:20 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Piloting 133 November 12th 03 08:26 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.