A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rotax vs. Jabiru



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 5th 06, 05:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rotax vs. Jabiru

"Montblack" wrote in
:

("UltraJohn" wrote)
I'm not sure if your talking about the 'built' version or E/AB
version. If it's the experimental version you can set the gross
weight where you like. Just limit it to the LSA requirement and your
good to go. You will lose some useful load which you can trade off
with smaller tanks and less range if you need the weight.



Could you ex"pound" on this - set the gross weight where you like?

Thanks


Mont ....blue, yeah, that's it - Montblue



As the builder/manufacturer of an ambuilt-experimental you can
absolutely set the max gross weight anywhere you like... Who is to tell
you that a kit that others have built and set at, say 1450lbs is
mandatory for you to do the same.... Of course, a ramp check when you
and your 200lb friend climb out and pull out pull out 200Lbs of camping
gear that's 150lbs over your gross weight will be a problem....

S-LSA and kit E-LSA are regulated as to the min usefull load to combat
just this issue... but ambuilt expermimental is not.
--
-- ET :-)

"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams
  #2  
Old January 5th 06, 06:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rotax vs. Jabiru

("ET" wrote)
S-LSA and kit E-LSA are regulated as to the min usefull load to combat
just this issue... but ambuilt expermimental is not.



Can a SP built, then fly an ambuilt experimental? I declare it to be
.......1,320 max gross?

I declare it to fly ...138 mph continuous max power, etc. I declare it to
have a stall speed of...


Montblack

  #3  
Old January 5th 06, 07:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rotax vs. Jabiru

"Montblack" wrote in
:

("ET" wrote)
S-LSA and kit E-LSA are regulated as to the min usefull load to
combat just this issue... but ambuilt expermimental is not.



Can a SP built, then fly an ambuilt experimental? I declare it to be
......1,320 max gross?

I declare it to fly ...138 mph continuous max power, etc. I declare it
to have a stall speed of...


Montblack



Simple answer, yes....

You don't "declare" it, per-se, but durring your phase one testing you
establish these numbers and enter them in your POH for phase II flying.

If your off a little... probably no problem.. if your "off" alot..
probably no good will come of it.....

--
-- ET :-)

"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Engine sound of Rotax 912 JK Home Built 12 May 22nd 05 02:47 PM
ROTAX 275 questions Eric Greenwell Soaring 0 January 6th 05 02:43 AM
Jabiru and Rotax engines Marco Rispoli Home Built 14 July 16th 04 07:23 AM
RV-9A's wing with Rotax 914? Shin Gou Home Built 26 March 7th 04 08:56 PM
Jabiru V Rotax reliability? Joe Home Built 11 September 5th 03 11:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.