![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skywise wrote in
: Snipola Damn...now I'm curious again. I'll have to see if I can google anything up on this. It may all just be poppycock, though. Here's what I've found, some of which may have been stated by others already. Some gov't agencies can require your SSN *IF* required by law. All gov't agencies are required to provide a disclosure statement stating how and why they are required by law to have your SSN. No gov't agency can deny you services for not providing your SSN *unless* they are required to have it by law. (see first point above) They may *think* they require it but unless they can provide a disclosure statement as required by law which states the law that requires them to use it, they probably don't have a right to it. (see point two above) Private business cannot compel you to provide your SSN unless the transaction involves notification of the IRS. No law prevents private business from asking for your SSN, and no law exists to prevent them from refusing to do business with you for refusing to release your SSN. It seems the only legal right any private business has with your SSN is for tax purposes (such as your employer). Not even insurers, creditors, or banks can *require* it. If they insist on it, you are encouraged to complain to higher levels as they may have policies to allow the use of an alternate number that the peeons aren't aware of. If they continue to insist, you are encouraged to take your business elsewhere. As always, there are the scattered exceptions to the rules, and each state may have additional laws. Information gleaned from: http://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs10-ssn.htm Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skywise wrote:
Not even insurers, creditors, or banks can *require* it. Banks can require it, since they are obligated to report certain transactions to the IRS. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:w_jvf.15562$Gu6.3912@trnddc06... Banks can require it, since they are obligated to report certain transactions to the IRS. Anyone can require it. If you decline, they can refuse to do business with you. It's like those stupid binding arbitration agreements that stock brokers all use now. You have a choice to refuse them, but then you can't use any real financial services, because there aren't any companies that don't have them. Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Private business cannot compel you to provide your SSN
unless the transaction involves notification of the IRS. No law prevents private business from asking for your SSN, and no law exists to prevent them from refusing to do business with you for refusing to release your SSN. These two together (both of which are in fact true) do give the lie to the word "compel" though. Jose -- You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
These two together (both of which are in fact true) do give the lie to the word "compel" though. that's how ID cards, rfid and/or biometric IDs/passports, etc. are being snuck in pretty much everywhe hey, it's not compulsory, but if you don't have one, you won't be allowed to fly, ride the train, take the bus, drive, etc. --Sylvain |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Another ADIZ violation? | Dan Foster | Piloting | 5 | January 4th 06 02:25 AM |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |