![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seems to be to me, that everyone's SS number is "out there" and here's
why. 1) Can't get a credit card without one. 2) Drivers license. 3) Most hospitals require it. 4) Social Security has it (and their data base has been compromised int he past.) 5) Phone company (cell and landline require it) And probably lot's more places like buying a home etc. So, I wonder just how one can keep the number private? On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 01:54:27 -0800, Sylvain wrote: Skywise wrote: My understanding is that of those four listed, only the IRS has a legal right to the number. that was my understanding too, but it seems that the DMV can indeed require it, at least here in California (I can dig it up if you'd like, it's probably buried in my privacy related doc); oh I forgot another bunch of folks who demand (and use rather casually SSN#): anything to do with the military it seems whether directly or indirectly (e.g., you wont be able to register for a high altitude training without it, the CAP for some reason demand it, etc.) --Sylvain |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Masino wrote:
snip The thing that upsets me is that, even though almost 20,000 people have submitted comments to the FAA on the NPR for making the ADIZ permanent, there are something like 400,000 AOPA members. Where the hell are the other 380,000 AOPA members/pilots? Why aren't they submiting comments? The unfortunate thruth is that the aviation community is *far* from the close knit community that some people like to pretend it is. And there's a reason for that. Pilots have attitudes, and it gets in the way of that close knit community thing. |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Terry wrote:
1) Can't get a credit card without one. fair enough, but that's because they check your credit history and these bozos of the credit bureaus keep using SSN#... Note that you can protect yourself a bit here, by putting a freeze on your credit history (you have to contact all credit bureaus and ask for it, and they'll charge you money for the privilege, ten bucks each); so even if someone's steal your SSN#, you can limit the potential damage to some extent. 3) Most hospitals require it. you tell them no. and it works, there is nothing they can do about it. All they need to know is your insurance information (which shouldn't mention your SSN#); it might take some arguing -- some people just don't like to do things differently if they have 'always done it that way' -- but just keep smiling, be polite, and stand your ground. Now the health insurance demand the number as well, and it is also possible to tell them no, but it is tricky; I didn't manage there... but I got them to abide by the California Civil Code Section 1798.85 and they don't use it as a ID number... that's the best I was able to obtain here... 5) Phone company (cell and landline require it) you can tell them no, and it works too. I used pre-paid plans for my cell phone, and the only number they care to know is that of my credit card :-) but you are right: there are far too many people who demand this number even though they have no legitimate reasons to know it. --Sylvain |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Terry wrote in
: Seems to be to me, that everyone's SS number is "out there" and here's why. 1) Can't get a credit card without one. 2) Drivers license. 3) Most hospitals require it. 4) Social Security has it (and their data base has been compromised int he past.) 5) Phone company (cell and landline require it) And probably lot's more places like buying a home etc. So, I wonder just how one can keep the number private? Not easily, I'll admit. The problem is that people were giving it out so freely to begin with due to their own complacency/ignorance/gullibity. Now it's like **** in the ocean. Because so many people so willingly allowed their SSN to be used for things it was never intended to be used for, it's now considered normal and everyone expects you to just cough it up whenever they ask for it. It's become this way because people allowed it to. And it didn't happen overnight. Reversing the course won't happen overnight either. But if people start refusing to allow their SSN to be used so gratuitously, things will turn around. It'll take time. It won't be easy at first. But if people want to change things, they have to start somewhere. Unfortunately, I realize it probably won't happen without something forcing the issue, such as government legislation. Most people are all too willing to bitch and moan about a problem, but how many of them are actually willing to do something, even a little thing, to change it. It's always "let someone else fix it". sigh Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
there are far too many people who
demand this number even though they have no legitimate reasons to know it. Not to mention all those that have "just the last four digits". Most of the rest of the digits can be reconstructed by anybody who knows how the system is set up. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John T" wrote in message
m... Happy Dog wrote: You fly? You couldn't do this? FSS, *any* ATC. A student should be able to fihure this out. You're right. Why didn't this student (Martin)? Why didn't Shaeffer? I agree that they're idiots. But I was referring to the entire US Government effort directed at intercepting them. This incursion was a foreseeable occurrance and they seriously botched it. snip Monday Morning QBing Funny. Isn't that what you're doing? Hardly. The fact remains Shaeffer screwed us all with this stunt and largely because of him (and the overreaction by DC officials), we face a *permanent* ADIZ. Now you come along and appear sympathetic to him. I don't much care about him. He got a bit worse than I think he deserved. But not as bad as he could have. Any interaction with law enforcement is like that. This was fairly ordinary. Let him cry on your shoulder, if you'd like. I'm too busy dealing with the consequences of his actions to be sympathetic to him in the least. Godlike. moo |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The thing that upsets me is that, even though almost 20,000 people have
submitted comments to the FAA on the NPR for making the ADIZ permanent, there are something like 400,000 AOPA members. Where the hell are the other 380,000 AOPA members/pilots? Why aren't they submiting comments? The unfortunate thruth is that the aviation community is *far* from the close knit community that some people like to pretend it is. How true! Getting pilots to agree on anything is like herding cats. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:18:40 -0800, Sylvain wrote in
:: I used pre-paid plans for my cell phone, Do all providers offer pre-paid plans? |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
I used pre-paid plans for my cell phone, Do all providers offer pre-paid plans? no and if you compare cost on a dollars per minute basis, it is usually a bad deal (if you are a heavy user); however, since I use few minutes, and the plan I have carry over the ones I don't use, it's good enough for my purpose. --Sylvain |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Another ADIZ violation? | Dan Foster | Piloting | 5 | January 4th 06 02:25 AM |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |