A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How long to keep VOR check records?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 31st 04, 05:57 PM
Otis Winslow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have pages in a notebook in the plane for VOR checks. That way I
have a record of how the VOR has been over a period of time. There's
quite a few lines on each page .. no not much space to keep them
for a while.


"Ross Oliver" wrote in message
...

So here's a question I had never thought of until getting my
instrument rating and owning an IFR-equipped aircraft: how long
should records of VOR checks be retained? Do they need to be
retained at all? Can the FAA come to me and ask, "Remember that
IFR flight to SLO you made 2 years ago? Show us the VOR check for
that flight."

This came to mind because the next VOR check entry will fill up
the form I have been using, and I'll have to start a new one. So
I have to decide whether to discard the filled sheet, or save it
somewhere. Is there any value to saving these with the aircraft
maintenance records?


Happy landings,
Ross Oliver



  #2  
Old April 1st 04, 04:52 AM
Travis Marlatte
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What trend do you see? I've never had a VOR not check within specs but the
only trend I would care about is the first time it doesn't. To the avionics
shop we go...

--
-------------------------------
Travis
"Otis Winslow" wrote in message
.. .
I have pages in a notebook in the plane for VOR checks. That way I
have a record of how the VOR has been over a period of time. There's
quite a few lines on each page .. no not much space to keep them
for a while.


"Ross Oliver" wrote in message
...

So here's a question I had never thought of until getting my
instrument rating and owning an IFR-equipped aircraft: how long
should records of VOR checks be retained? Do they need to be
retained at all? Can the FAA come to me and ask, "Remember that
IFR flight to SLO you made 2 years ago? Show us the VOR check for
that flight."

This came to mind because the next VOR check entry will fill up
the form I have been using, and I'll have to start a new one. So
I have to decide whether to discard the filled sheet, or save it
somewhere. Is there any value to saving these with the aircraft
maintenance records?


Happy landings,
Ross Oliver





  #3  
Old April 1st 04, 12:43 PM
Dan Thompson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I can't think of a reason to keep them after they have been superceded. A
post-it note that you throw away with each new check, or fill up with 3-4
checks then start a new one, would be perfectly adequate. The record
requirement for VOR checks is kind of an anachronism, really.

"Otis Winslow" wrote in message
.. .
I have pages in a notebook in the plane for VOR checks. That way I
have a record of how the VOR has been over a period of time. There's
quite a few lines on each page .. no not much space to keep them
for a while.


"Ross Oliver" wrote in message
...

So here's a question I had never thought of until getting my
instrument rating and owning an IFR-equipped aircraft: how long
should records of VOR checks be retained? Do they need to be
retained at all? Can the FAA come to me and ask, "Remember that
IFR flight to SLO you made 2 years ago? Show us the VOR check for
that flight."

This came to mind because the next VOR check entry will fill up
the form I have been using, and I'll have to start a new one. So
I have to decide whether to discard the filled sheet, or save it
somewhere. Is there any value to saving these with the aircraft
maintenance records?


Happy landings,
Ross Oliver





  #4  
Old April 8th 04, 09:33 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


The record
requirement for VOR checks is kind of an anachronism, really.


How so? (I take it "anacrhonism" here means something that once was valid or
useful, and no longer is, but still must be done)

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #5  
Old April 9th 04, 03:31 AM
Dan Thompson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, since practically everybody uses GPS, and radar coverage is
essentially nationwide now, making sure your VOR is accurate within a couple
of degrees every 30 days, and also keeping a detailed record of that, seems
a bit out of date. Kind of like making sure your buggy whip is in good
condition every 30 days.

"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

The record
requirement for VOR checks is kind of an anachronism, really.


How so? (I take it "anacrhonism" here means something that once was valid

or
useful, and no longer is, but still must be done)

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)



  #6  
Old April 9th 04, 04:11 AM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Well, since practically everybody uses GPS


Uh... no.


and radar coverage is
essentially nationwide now,


Uh... no.


making sure your VOR is accurate within a couple
of degrees every 30 days, and also keeping a detailed record of that, seems
a bit out of date.


Oh. I thought you meant just the recordkeeping part. If you have and use a
VOR IFR it better be accurate.

Jose



--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #7  
Old April 9th 04, 11:06 AM
Dan Thompson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well for me, VOR is backup no. 2 behind radar vectors/ handheld GPS, if my
primary GPS goes out. I have been pretty good about logging VOR checks, but
it is starting to seem a little silly since I haven't used a VOR for IFR nav
in years.
"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

Well, since practically everybody uses GPS


Uh... no.


and radar coverage is
essentially nationwide now,


Uh... no.


making sure your VOR is accurate within a couple
of degrees every 30 days, and also keeping a detailed record of that,

seems
a bit out of date.


Oh. I thought you meant just the recordkeeping part. If you have and use

a
VOR IFR it better be accurate.

Jose



--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)



  #8  
Old April 10th 04, 06:43 PM
Roger Halstead
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 10:06:08 GMT, "Dan Thompson"
wrote:

Well for me, VOR is backup no. 2 behind radar vectors/ handheld GPS, if my
primary GPS goes out. I have been pretty good about logging VOR checks, but
it is starting to seem a little silly since I haven't used a VOR for IFR nav
in years.


Then you haven't had to do a VOR check in years either.

It only has to have a current check if you are using it.
Far as that goes, (as I understand) you can take off in VFR
conditions, do the check and file.


Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

snip
  #9  
Old April 9th 04, 05:01 AM
Andrew Sarangan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dan Thompson" wrote in
. com:

Well, since practically everybody uses GPS, and radar coverage is
essentially nationwide now, making sure your VOR is accurate within a
couple of degrees every 30 days, and also keeping a detailed record of
that, seems a bit out of date. Kind of like making sure your buggy
whip is in good condition every 30 days.


Radar coverage does not extend nationwide at low altitudes. In fact I would
bet that 99% of the country does not have radar coverage below 1000' AGL.
This is where VOR accuracy really matters anyway.

  #10  
Old April 9th 04, 11:13 AM
Dan Thompson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I bet you are right. Since it is not possible to fly under IFR below 1000
AGL, except taking off or on an approach, what difference does that make?

"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
. 158...
"Dan Thompson" wrote in
. com:

Well, since practically everybody uses GPS, and radar coverage is
essentially nationwide now, making sure your VOR is accurate within a
couple of degrees every 30 days, and also keeping a detailed record of
that, seems a bit out of date. Kind of like making sure your buggy
whip is in good condition every 30 days.


Radar coverage does not extend nationwide at low altitudes. In fact I

would
bet that 99% of the country does not have radar coverage below 1000' AGL.
This is where VOR accuracy really matters anyway.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post MrHabilis Home Built 0 June 11th 04 05:07 PM
Flight test update - long nauga Home Built 1 June 5th 04 03:09 AM
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) Dave S Home Built 20 May 21st 04 03:02 PM
Simpy One of Many Stories of a Time Not So Long Ago Badwater Bill Home Built 40 March 16th 04 06:35 PM
IFR Long X/C and the Specter of Expectations David B. Cole Instrument Flight Rules 0 February 24th 04 07:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.