A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tensile Strength Question Continued



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 17th 06, 11:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Tensile Strength Question Continued


Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
"Dick" wrote:

okay, got pounds per Square Inch and elongation differences and the failure
sequence in my noodle.

For simplicity, let's use 120,000 and 80,000 psi numbers.

So if the 120,000 # piece is .667 square inches
and the 80,000# piece is 1.0 square inch,,,are the elongations the same???

Thanks, Dick


Ummm...

Think about it for a moment. To be different strengths, the two steels
must differ in chemical composition, right?


Surprisingly enough, that is not true. A treatable steel can be
hardened and annealed over a broad range of tensile strengths.
The bulk composition of the alloy does not change, but the
crystaline structure and the compositions of those crystals
changes.

Crudely stated, metals consist of microscopic crystals that butt
up against each other. The simplest heat treatable alloy,
carbon steel, is just iron and carbon. When fully annealed
(softest) all of the carbon is collected into tiny crstals
of graphite and the bulk of the material is pure iron crystals.
In that form, it really isn't steel at all, it is just wrought iron.
Heat treating will cause some of the carbon to combine chemically
with the iron and form carbides. Then you have steel and there
will be some pure iron crystals, some pure graphite crystals,
and some carbide crystals but the bulk proportion of
carbon atoms to iron atoms will remain the same.

The different hardnesses depend partly on how much carbide is
formed and partly on the geometry of the atoms in those crystals.
The geometry within the crystals can be manipulated by heating
to a temperature at which the geometry (packing) changes and then
cooling it so fast that they 'freeze' in that state.

All this happens without any change in the bulk composition of the
alloy. Which, I grant you is quite counter-intuitive.

Do you think that that
wouldn't also lead to different elongation under the same load?


The relationship between elongation and applied load depends on
a property called Young's modulus. It depends almost entirely on
the bulk composition of the material and is independent of the
strength of the material. Heat treating an alloy to a different
strength
does not affect its modulus.

Iron has the highest modulus of any of the natural elements which is
why really big stars become supernovae. More relevent to the
present discussion, small differences in the compositon of a
steel have almost no effect on their moduli. Thus all steel alloys
that are 99% iron have esentially the same modulus as pure
iron.

Even the 18-8 stainless steels that are less than 65% iron have
moduli that about 90% that of pure iron.

Neat, eh?

--

FF

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If I make it stronger Jdandy Home Built 9 August 30th 04 08:22 PM
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? Matthew G. Saroff Military Aviation 111 May 4th 04 05:34 PM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM
Hinges under stress - mechanical engineering type question Corrie Home Built 21 August 6th 03 08:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.