![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But would you have to replace the engine?
Maybe just a crank overhaul every 4-500 hours, in the middle of winter, after a good snow storm, nothing else to do. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I just think hanging a prop on a crank directly is a non-starter in the first place...especially on a crank and case not specifically designed for this in the first palce. Maybe a good redrive and flywheel would be a better way to go? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bret Ludwig" wrote in message oups.com... I just think hanging a prop on a crank directly is a non-starter in the first place...especially on a crank and case not specifically designed for this in the first palce. Maybe a good redrive and flywheel would be a better way to go? That is my opinion, also. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When it really gets down to facts, most often aircraft engines really
don't cost any more than auto conversions and the aircraft engine appears to be more reliable. No redrives needed, redundant ignition and lots of other things that makes them better. I was a firm believer in auto engine conversions but i haven't seen many last a long time except for the Subaru and Rotax engines. Morgans wrote: "Bret Ludwig" wrote in message oups.com... I just think hanging a prop on a crank directly is a non-starter in the first place...especially on a crank and case not specifically designed for this in the first palce. Maybe a good redrive and flywheel would be a better way to go? That is my opinion, also. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... When it really gets down to facts, most often aircraft engines really don't cost any more than auto conversions and the aircraft engine appears to be more reliable. No redrives needed, redundant ignition and lots of other things that makes them better. I was a firm believer in auto engine conversions but i haven't seen many last a long time except for the Subaru and Rotax engines. There are many V-6's running, some significant numbers, time wise. VW's flying all over the place. Mercedes diesels in what, Thielert brand name? Oh, by the way, Rotax is NOT an auto conversion. -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:06:33 -0600, Cal Vanize
wrote: I don't think there's any dispute over the relative cost of engines. This issue is longevity and whether one wants to fly an airplane with an engine that might not make it to the next airport. Cal, the statement I was responding to was from the guy who said that auto engines end up essentially costing as much as an aircraft engine. I was posting my actual costs to suggest that the costs are, or can be, very much lower for the auto engine conversion than for a rebuilt aircraft engine. But I chose to do all the work, except for the machining of the engine parts, myself. If you do not wish to put in that kind of time, or do not have the knowledge to do so, then the options tend to be a lot more expensive. Buying a firewall forward package and simply bolting it in place and connecting the wires and fuel lines will of course cost a bunch more than doing everything yourself. Perhaps this is what that gentleman was talking about. Corky Scott |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:06:33 -0600, Cal Vanize
wrote: I don't think there's any dispute over the relative cost of engines. This issue is longevity and whether one wants to fly an airplane with an engine that might not make it to the next airport. You mean like a Lycoming? or an old Franklin? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote)
I bought two 3.8L Ford V6's for $150 each, bought new pistons from Roush racing, new rings, had the best block shot peened bored and honed, had the best crank turned and nitrided, bought new bearings, new cam, new distributer with two sensors installed for dual ignition, new pistons, new timing gears and chain, planed the heads, had four new intake valves installed and new guides installed as well, new valve springs, roller rockers, new lifters, new carburetor, old style NWAero psru, ARP studs for the crank bearings and cylinderheads, fabricated my own headers, and STILL spent only about $6,000. Why not fuel injected? Also, is that two for $3K each? What does that setup weigh? Was matching a prop to your engine a problem? 3 bladed prop? Curious... Montblack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |
P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 01:09 AM |
What if the germans... | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 119 | January 26th 04 11:20 PM |
Corvair Engine Conversion Breakin Success | Dick | Home Built | 1 | January 11th 04 02:06 PM |
Corvair Conversion | Gig Giacona | Home Built | 17 | October 27th 03 09:43 PM |