![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article dQqAf.714892$x96.30673@attbi_s72,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: The magnets aren't a big deal--really. I admire your brand loyalty -- but the consensus of every pilot I know (and, more importantly, every pilot I know who has purchased a 396) is that Garmin really, REALLY didn't do their homework with that antenna. It's almost as dumb as the floppy disk manufacturer that included a refrigerator magnet with every disk... It has nothing to do with brand loyalty and everything to do with reality. The reality is that if you position the XM receiver away from the compass, the magnets make no difference. Even on the glareshield of most aircraft, the magnets should make little to no difference. I don't know about you, but I rarely use my compass as my primary navigation source. My assessment is that Garmin did "do their homework" with the receiver--it is a far superior design to the WxWorx equipment. The magnets are in the receiver because Garmin markets the same receiver to the automotive market, where the magnets may be beneficial. I suspect Garmin's market research shows a much greater market in automotive than in aviation. Regardless of your opinion on the magnets, the fact is that if you want XM weather in a hand held GPS, you have only one choice--Garmin. JKG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Regardless of your opinion on the magnets, the fact is that if you want
XM weather in a hand held GPS, you have only one choice--Garmin. For now. As with everything in our economy, a little competition ought to help. If and when Lowrance jumps into the on-board weather market, it'll get interesting... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote: Regardless of your opinion on the magnets, the fact is that if you want XM weather in a hand held GPS, you have only one choice--Garmin. For now. As with everything in our economy, a little competition ought to help. If and when Lowrance jumps into the on-board weather market, it'll get interesting... It's not just Garmin we need competition for: I'm also rooting for WSI to form a strong alliance--perhaps with Lowrance--to put some subscription price pressure on XmWx. I've now flown with the 396 for several months, and the days before it seem like the dark ages--like before GPS or ANR headsets. There is a huge market for this technology if the price comes down a little. $2,500 + $30/mo. is simply too steep for many people. -- Dan "The future has actually been here for a while, it's just not readily available to everyone." -- some guy at MIT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AirMap 1000 - 2000 , Great CS from Lowrance | Dave | Piloting | 4 | September 8th 05 02:10 AM |
Smooth Lowrance Airmap 1000 updates | Longworth | Piloting | 2 | August 16th 05 01:52 AM |
Problem with Lowrance Database Update? | Stuart Grant | Piloting | 5 | December 24th 04 03:16 AM |
Portable GPS Sugggestion (Lowrance vs Garmin) | Pudealee | Piloting | 0 | September 6th 04 05:19 AM |
GPSMAP 195/196 vs. Lowrance AIPMAP 1000 | JJS | Piloting | 4 | March 9th 04 08:14 PM |