A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Blocked"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 11th 04, 08:19 PM
John R. Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter R." wrote in message =
...
Judah wrote:=20
=20
Because the proper response to "was that for N12345" is from the=20
controller, and is either "no" or a repeat of the call.

=20
Since the call is going to be repeated regardless, the obvious point=20
here is to simply not say anything and await the repeat. Saying "was=20
that for blah, blah" just uselessly clutters the frequency even more.
=20
=20
--=20
Peter
=20

Under one circumstance, I'll say "blocked".
If I hear my own call just before the beginning of the squeal,
I'm likely to transmit: "Blocked. Say again for Nxxxx."
It saves the wait time for the controller to decide I'm not responding.
---JRC---

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.