![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can tell you that I have been told to intercept the ILS at altitudes
well above the glideslope intercept altitude at the FAF by ATC. I have been cleared for the approach outside of the FAF. I followed their instructions and flew the approach. Never have had a problem. I don't see what the problem is, so long as you are intercepting the glideslope from below, and so long as you are at least as high as is charted you should be. So long as you make sure you are at the proper altitude when you cross the FAF, I don't see the problem. Unless I see it as unsafe or some obvious violation, I do what ATC tells me to do. What did your CFI tell you to do? Decline ATC's instruction? If you do that, the ATC guy is going to be confused and probably ask you what it is you want to do. In which case you can tell him that you want to go down to 1800' and intercept there. Ok, descend to 1800', intercept and cleared. Not much different than what you did, now is it? In the meantime, the freq is crowded and in all the confusion someone else is hosed, maybe you too as ATC might have to leave you and talk to someone else. Or maybe, in the meantime your plane has gotten out of shape (have fun going missed). To some extent we pilots have to rely on ATC to be telling us to do the right thing. Sure, watch out for being cleared into a mountain, but something like this seems ok to me..... Some pilots take the tactic not to have ATC control them, but have them control ATC by telling ATC what they are going to do and that they expect that as their clearance. You can try that approach, but sometimes it backfires. Me, I have discovered I can't fly the airplane and do ATC's job too. But then I rarely have the luxury of a copilot. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another comment I would make is if you decline ATC's instruction at
this point, you are probably going to end up going missed (or intercepting the glideslope from above). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug wrote:
I can tell you that I have been told to intercept the ILS at altitudes well above the glideslope intercept altitude at the FAF by ATC. I have been cleared for the approach outside of the FAF. I followed their instructions and flew the approach. Never have had a problem. I don't see what the problem is, so long as you are intercepting the glideslope from below, and so long as you are at least as high as is charted you should be. So long as you make sure you are at the proper altitude when you cross the FAF, I don't see the problem. Unless I see it as unsafe or some obvious violation, I do what ATC tells me to do. The OP didn't say what ATC's instruction was, so we don't know. I don't think ATC's instruction is relevant to the OP's question. The OP just wanted to know whether descent to 1800 was mandatory. As far as we know, ATC didn't instruct the OP one way or the other. snip |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug" wrote in message ups.com... What did your CFI tell you to do? Decline ATC's instruction? If you do that, the ATC guy is going to be confused and probably ask you what it is you want to do. In which case you can tell him that you want to go down to 1800' and intercept there. Ok, descend to 1800', intercept and cleared. That may not be possible. If the MVA is 2000 then 2000 is as low as ATC can go. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug wrote:
What did your CFI tell you to do? Decline ATC's instruction? *** Actually, he didn't tell me to do anything. He mentioned it after I had already started down the glideslope. At that point, I was pretty busy, so I just said "Let's talk about it on the ground". Then on the ground, it slipped through the slats. - Jerry Kaidor ( ) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|