A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Going for the Visual"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 14th 04, 08:02 PM
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
FAA Order 7110.65P Air Traffic Control
[...]
the pilot subsequently reports:

1. The airport or the runway in sight at airports with operating control
towers.

2. The airport in sight at airports without a control tower.


Why the distinction? Given that the runway is part of the airport,
under what circumstances could you possibly have the runway, but not the
airport, in sight?
  #2  
Old April 14th 04, 08:17 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...

Why the distinction? Given that the runway is part of the airport,
under what circumstances could you possibly have the runway,
but not the airport, in sight?


Beats the hell outta me.


  #3  
Old April 14th 04, 09:02 PM
John R. Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message =
ink.net...
=20
"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...

Why the distinction? Given that the runway is part of the airport,
under what circumstances could you possibly have the runway,
but not the airport, in sight?

=20
Beats the hell outta me.
=20
=20


Case of airport OR runway:
At big places like KIAD and CYYZ,
it's easy to have a runway in sight, but not the whole airport.
Been there, done that.
Probably the same at KDFW and KDEN, too.

Case of airport-only (with no control tower):
Special consideration for those hard-to-see grass strips, maybe?
---JRC---

  #4  
Old April 14th 04, 09:26 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
...

Case of airport OR runway:
At big places like KIAD and CYYZ,
it's easy to have a runway in sight, but not the whole airport.
Been there, done that.
Probably the same at KDFW and KDEN, too.


There's no requirement to see the whole airport.


  #5  
Old April 15th 04, 04:10 AM
John R. Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message =
ink.net...
=20
"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
...

Case of airport OR runway:
At big places like KIAD and CYYZ,
it's easy to have a runway in sight, but not the whole airport.
Been there, done that.
Probably the same at KDFW and KDEN, too.

=20
There's no requirement to see the whole airport.
=20

Clearly so. That's what I tried to say..
---JRC---

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 81 March 20th 04 02:34 PM
Night over water Stuart King Instrument Flight Rules 43 March 4th 04 01:13 AM
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 45 November 20th 03 05:20 AM
Visual Appr. Stuart King Instrument Flight Rules 15 September 17th 03 08:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.