421C down in Washington State

I agree that a 421C can be handled by one pilot as long as things are going
well. However, should something pop up that diverts the pilot's attention,
like trying to stay out of the clouds at relatively low altitude in
mountainous terrain, it can be problematical. Had he been instrument rated,
he would have been above FL180 in the sunshine, with a lot of altitude/time
to work things out if necessary. My one and only "feather and land"
experience was in a 421C, and I was very happy that the FBO I worked for
required two pilots on IFR charters...the extra hands and brain came in
handy. Being at 14000 when the engine packed up didn't hurt. A 421 is not a
scud-running airplane.


Scott D wrote in message
...
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:57:33 +0100, G Farris wrote:

In article . com,
says...


I would think that few insurance companies would insure a pilot in a
421 without an Instrument rating!


I don't pretend to know how the insurance companies see it, but that is a
lot of airplane to manage for a single pilot - IR rated or not. In many
ways, a KingAir would be "easier" to fly in those conditions.

GF

How is the 421C a lot of airplane for one pilot? I find it quiet easy
for one pilot. With all the switches located on the left side of the
seat, I find it much easier for one pilot to operate than for two. It
is hard for the copilot to activate a lot of stuff like the lights,
deicing/anti icing equipment... you name it. There is not much
accessible for a right seat pilot to reach without interfering with
the left seat pilot.

Scott D.

take out the obvious to email me