A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Definition of simulated instrument conditions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 29th 06, 06:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Definition of simulated instrument conditions

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:09:13 -0500, Ron Rosenfeld
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:40:00 GMT, bsalai wrote:

Does anyone know if Simulated Instrument Conditions is defined anywhere?

The reason for the question is whether one can log instrument time, say
at night, when you don't look outside, but don't wear foggles or a hood?

I can't find anything in the rules that defines simulated instrument
conditions, but since the rule for logging instrument time says both
that flight has to be solely by referenct to instruments in actual or
simulated instrument conditions, that would suggest that more is
required than "solely by reference to instruments" and therefore that
some sort of view limiting device is required.

It would certainly be easier if they defined simulated insturment
conditions though.

Brad


It is not defined in the regulations. But it was "defined" in a published
FAA Chief Counsel legal interpretation some twenty or so years ago:

==============================================
--quoted text--
First, you ask for an interpretation of Section 61.51(c)(4) of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) regarding the logging of instrument
flight time. You ask whether, for instance, a flight over the ocean on
a moonless night without a discernible horizon could be logged as
actual instrument flight time.
***
As you know, Section 61.51(c)(4) provides rules for the logging of
instrument flight time which may be used to meet the requirements of a
certificate or rating, or to meet the recent flight experience
requirements of Part 61. That section provides in part, that a pilot
may log as instrument flight time only that time during which he or
she operates the aircraft solely by reference to instruments, under
actual (instrument meteorological conditions (imc)) or simulated
instrument flight conditions. "Simulated" instrument conditions occur
when the pilot's vision outside of the aircraft is intentionally
restricted, such as by a hood or goggles. "Actual" instrument flight
conditions occur when some outside conditions make it necessary for
the pilot to use the aircraft instruments in order to maintain
adequate control over the aircraft. Typically, these conditions
involve adverse weather conditions.
To answer your first question, actual instrument conditions may
occur in the case you described a moonless night over the ocean with
no discernible horizon, if use of the instruments is necessary to
maintain adequate control over the aircraft. The determination as to
whether flight by reference to instruments is necessary is somewhat
subjective and based in part on the sound judgment of the pilot. Note
that, under Section 61.51(b)(3), the pilot must log the conditions of
the flight. The log should include the reasons for determining that
the flight was under actual instrument conditions in case the pilot
later would be called on to prove that the actual instrument flight
time logged was legitimate.
========================================
Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)


Way for the FAQ from 7/05 and the Chief Council to say different
things on the exact same question!
  #2  
Old January 30th 06, 12:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Definition of simulated instrument conditions

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:20:29 -0500, Peter Clark
wrote:

Way for the FAQ from 7/05 and the Chief Council to say different
things on the exact same question!


Chief Counsel trumps FAQ's.

But the Chief Counsel opinion seems to advise a complete description as to
the nature of the conditions, rather than just logging "actual"


"The log should include the reasons for determining that
the flight was under actual instrument conditions in case the pilot
later would be called on to prove that the actual instrument flight
time logged was legitimate."


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) Paul Folbrecht Instrument Flight Rules 10 February 11th 05 02:41 AM
Logging approaches Ron Garrison Instrument Flight Rules 109 March 2nd 04 05:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.