![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net, Richard Lamb
says... Just as a friendly challenge to anyone foolish enough... Design an airplane within the 254 pound weight limit. Clean sheet of paper. 254 pounds empty weight. Your choice of engines, design, materials. Where would you start? I for one have done it www.cgsaviation.com/hawkultra.htm and so have others.Mine not also meets the 254 # but the stall speed and top speed criteria set by the feds in part 103-7. Although I don't think this is the style of plane the original questioner had in mind. Weight is relative and on this end of the spectrum alum sheet gets heavy as a build material.Especially if it's over .020. The Hummel plane is all alum and can carry a 200# guy has a fairly good sized wing, so it's not a rocket at landing.But it still tips the scales at almost 300# empty. It's an interesting challenge something us Ultralight guys have had to work with for about 25 years. One thing I did was to not design to the 170# FAA pilot since most pilots I know and and those I see at airshows haven't been 170# since 8th grade ,that includes me as well :-)So your design should use 200# -220# for the design criteria. Good luck. See ya Chuck S |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article . net, Richard Lamb says... Just as a friendly challenge to anyone foolish enough... Design an airplane within the 254 pound weight limit. Clean sheet of paper. 254 pounds empty weight. Your choice of engines, design, materials. Where would you start? I for one have done it www.cgsaviation.com/hawkultra.htm and so have others.Mine not also meets the 254 # but the stall speed and top speed criteria set by the feds in part 103-7. Although I don't think this is the style of plane the original questioner had in mind. Weight is relative and on this end of the spectrum alum sheet gets heavy as a build material.Especially if it's over .020. The Hummel plane is all alum and can carry a 200# guy has a fairly good sized wing, so it's not a rocket at landing.But it still tips the scales at almost 300# empty. It's an interesting challenge something us Ultralight guys have had to work with for about 25 years. One thing I did was to not design to the 170# FAA pilot since most pilots I know and and those I see at airshows haven't been 170# since 8th grade ,that includes me as well :-)So your design should use 200# -220# for the design criteria. Good luck. See ya Chuck S Hey Chuck, I've seen those around. There are two or three at Kitty Hawk. Guess I'll go visit and see how they fly! Richard |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Lamb wrote:
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote: In article . net, Richard Lamb says... Just as a friendly challenge to anyone foolish enough... Design an airplane within the 254 pound weight limit. Clean sheet of paper. 254 pounds empty weight. Your choice of engines, design, materials. Where would you start? I for one have done it www.cgsaviation.com/hawkultra.htm and so have others.Mine not also meets the 254 # but the stall speed and top speed criteria set by the feds in part 103-7. Although I don't think this is the style of plane the original questioner had in mind. Weight is relative and on this end of the spectrum alum sheet gets heavy as a build material.Especially if it's over .020. The Hummel plane is all alum and can carry a 200# guy has a fairly good sized wing, so it's not a rocket at landing.But it still tips the scales at almost 300# empty. It's an interesting challenge something us Ultralight guys have had to work with for about 25 years. One thing I did was to not design to the 170# FAA pilot since most pilots I know and and those I see at airshows haven't been 170# since 8th grade ,that includes me as well :-)So your design should use 200# -220# for the design criteria. Good luck. See ya Chuck S Hey Chuck, I've seen those around. There are two or three at Kitty Hawk. Guess I'll go visit and see how they fly! Richard There's a volcanolgist in Iceland that has been flying one over some pretty dangerous ground for for the past few years. By all accounts it a good plane but he but have titanium balls to fly any ultralight over a volcano... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Cuban Missle Crisis - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 2nd 05 09:14 PM |
Newbie Qs on stalls and spins | Ramapriya | Piloting | 72 | November 23rd 04 04:05 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |