![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've got 3 ECI cylinders on one engine. I just got done checking them for
the recent replacement AD. I dodged a bullet...this time... and until when??? I also know that our aerial applicator will not touch anything made by ECI, they claim they've just seen too much junk come from that company. YMMV Jim "Blanche" wrote in message ... Denny wrote: Hmm, Blanche - So, what brand is the cylinder that went 2500 hours? ECI? Millenium? Not that I care what brand cylinder you purchase, but if you were to buy a shiny new half million dollar airplane what brand cylinders will be on it? These are 3 original Lycoming cylinders from 1969 and one overhauled about 10 years ago. On the issue of overhaul versus new, look for an article written some years ago by Richard Collins on his experience with overhauling cylinders... He bought the airplane new... It went to TBO without any cylinder work... He overhauled the engine and cylinders and again went to TBO, this time he had couple of bad cylinders along the way... He did a second overhaul on the engine and cylinders and again went to TBO, this time he lost 4 cylinders along the way... Given the cost of having 4 cylinders removed and reworked/replaced you could buy gold plated new cylinders and still be money ahead in 2500 hours... The math is simple on cylinders, overhaul and save pennies now so you can lose dollars later... Your call... And your point is? I'm missing something here. No difference on the break in procedure new cylinders versus overhauled... Seating rings is seating rings... The new rings don't know what age the cylinder is... Great! My concern is how the break-in process will impact the current cylinders, too. No core deposit, new cylinders are purchased outright... The three brands differ slightly in what new parts they include... Do your home work... I'm trying. Isn't that why I posted here? r.a.o is another resource for me. And finally, did you research which of the three brands have had the highest percentage of cylinder recalls under AD and which one is currently having to replace all it's one line of cylinders out in the field under an AD? Facts - not emotion, not who has the slickest ads, not rumours on the internet - facts...... So - do you have this information handy? I get really tired of hunting thru a really crappy FAA database. You'd think with all the contracts they let for web stuff, they'd hire someone who understands the basics of user interface usability, database searches, and organization. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bad cylinder | Denny | Owning | 17 | September 12th 05 06:04 PM |
Unusual ECI Cylinder | [email protected] | Home Built | 4 | July 7th 05 01:27 AM |
Path of an airplane in a 1G roll | Chris W | Piloting | 47 | July 4th 05 10:53 PM |
Path of an airplane in a 1G roll | Chris W | Aerobatics | 20 | June 29th 05 09:35 AM |
Path of an airplane in a 1G roll | Chris W | Home Built | 22 | June 29th 05 09:35 AM |