A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

bad cylinder



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 31st 06, 04:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default bad cylinder

I've got 3 ECI cylinders on one engine. I just got done checking them for
the recent replacement AD. I dodged a bullet...this time... and until
when??? I also know that our aerial applicator will not touch anything made
by ECI, they claim they've just seen too much junk come from that company.

YMMV
Jim

"Blanche" wrote in message
...
Denny wrote:
Hmm, Blanche - So, what brand is the cylinder that went 2500 hours?
ECI? Millenium? Not that I care what brand cylinder you purchase, but
if you were to buy a shiny new half million dollar airplane what brand
cylinders will be on it?


These are 3 original Lycoming cylinders from 1969 and one overhauled
about 10 years ago.

On the issue of overhaul versus new, look for an article written some
years ago by Richard Collins on his experience with overhauling
cylinders... He bought the airplane new... It went to TBO without any
cylinder work... He overhauled the engine and cylinders and again went
to TBO, this time he had couple of bad cylinders along the way... He
did a second overhaul on the engine and cylinders and again went to
TBO, this time he lost 4 cylinders along the way... Given the cost of
having 4 cylinders removed and reworked/replaced you could buy gold
plated new cylinders and still be money ahead in 2500 hours... The
math is simple on cylinders, overhaul and save pennies now so you can
lose dollars later... Your call...


And your point is? I'm missing something here.

No difference on the break in procedure new cylinders versus
overhauled... Seating rings is seating rings... The new rings don't
know what age the cylinder is...


Great! My concern is how the break-in process will impact the current
cylinders, too.

No core deposit, new cylinders are purchased outright... The three
brands differ slightly in what new parts they include... Do your home
work...


I'm trying. Isn't that why I posted here? r.a.o is another resource
for me.

And finally, did you research which of the three brands have had the
highest percentage of cylinder recalls under AD and which one is
currently having to replace all it's one line of cylinders out in the
field under an AD? Facts - not emotion, not who has the slickest ads,
not rumours on the internet - facts......


So - do you have this information handy? I get really tired of
hunting thru a really crappy FAA database. You'd think with all
the contracts they let for web stuff, they'd hire someone who understands
the basics of user interface usability, database searches, and
organization.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad cylinder Denny Owning 17 September 12th 05 06:04 PM
Unusual ECI Cylinder [email protected] Home Built 4 July 7th 05 01:27 AM
Path of an airplane in a 1G roll Chris W Piloting 47 July 4th 05 10:53 PM
Path of an airplane in a 1G roll Chris W Aerobatics 20 June 29th 05 09:35 AM
Path of an airplane in a 1G roll Chris W Home Built 22 June 29th 05 09:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.