![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy Blackburn wrote:
income -- at least for the 'new glass' target demographic of top ~5% income earners. Sorry to say this is a very US centric point of view. Here most of the practisers are members of clubs and don't belong to the top 5% income earners. Of course increase of price of gliders implies that clubs are more expensive, and so that people who don't earn a lot, particularly young people, have more and more difficulties to soar. I think it is an obvious constatation that clubs are more and more stuffed with old guys, and in my opinion, this is a *very bad trend*. Only problem is that much of the rise in HH income is due to the rise in two-income families, so you may be more likely to need to get some of the money from your spouse. ;-) I will be happy to see a spouse who accepts that even small part of her earnings goes to a sport that she dislikes by principle :-( -- Michel TALON |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can't necessarily blame the problems of clubs on the prices of new
gliders. The clubs could as well buy second hand gliders - it's the club members (or managers) who *want* the most expensive toys, very often without regard whether the club members really need the difference between 47:1 or 40:1. But the effect is the same - less and less youngsters between 16 and 25 who are supposed to be the future of soaring :-( "Michel Talon" wrote in message ... Andy Blackburn wrote: income -- at least for the 'new glass' target demographic of top ~5% income earners. Sorry to say this is a very US centric point of view. Here most of the practisers are members of clubs and don't belong to the top 5% income earners. Of course increase of price of gliders implies that clubs are more expensive, and so that people who don't earn a lot, particularly young people, have more and more difficulties to soar. I think it is an obvious constatation that clubs are more and more stuffed with old guys, and in my opinion, this is a *very bad trend*. Only problem is that much of the rise in HH income is due to the rise in two-income families, so you may be more likely to need to get some of the money from your spouse. ;-) I will be happy to see a spouse who accepts that even small part of her earnings goes to a sport that she dislikes by principle :-( -- Michel TALON |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bert Willing wrote:
members (or managers) who *want* the most expensive toys, very often without regard whether the club members really need the difference between 47:1 or 40:1. Personally, I couldn't care less whether a glider offers 1:40 or 1:48. I *do* however care about its feel! I certainly enjoy a flight in an LS4, but no way I volunteer for an LS4 at the briefing when there's that LS7 or LS8 nearby! Stefan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can relate to that - but there is a price tag to it, and nobody can blame
the sailplane manufacturer for the fact that you want it :-) "Stefan" wrote in message ... Bert Willing wrote: members (or managers) who *want* the most expensive toys, very often without regard whether the club members really need the difference between 47:1 or 40:1. Personally, I couldn't care less whether a glider offers 1:40 or 1:48. I *do* however care about its feel! I certainly enjoy a flight in an LS4, but no way I volunteer for an LS4 at the briefing when there's that LS7 or LS8 nearby! Stefan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bert Willing wrote: You can't necessarily blame the problems of clubs on the prices of new gliders. The clubs could as well buy second hand gliders - it's the club members (or managers) who *want* the most expensive toys, very often without regard whether the club members really need the difference between 47:1 or 40:1. But the effect is the same - less and less youngsters between 16 and 25 who are supposed to be the future of soaring :-( - Problem in US that keeps a lot of youngsters from soaring is lack of any decent equipment in most of the clubs. When couple years ago I was visiting French club that only had 45 members they presented following list of gliders available for club members: 1 Ka-6, Ask-21, Libelle 201, 2 - Ls-1's, 2 Pegasus 101's, 1 edelweiss, 1 Phoebus,1 std.Cirrus and couple old French made trainers - all the club rates! How many non-profit clubs in US are there that could stand up to such equipment? NONE, if you want to get serious about soaring in US you have to own a glider and how many youngsters in US can afford to own a glider? So called "soaring with Schweitzer" is an oxymoron in Midwest area... GK |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LS10 info | John Galloway | Soaring | 0 | January 29th 06 08:20 PM |
LS10 info | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 1 | January 29th 06 07:33 PM |
LS10 info | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 0 | January 29th 06 05:33 PM |
LS10 info | [email protected] | Soaring | 25 | January 29th 06 05:09 PM |
Re LS10 info | Peter Thomas | Soaring | 0 | January 26th 06 08:08 PM |