![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While I don't agree in the need for the ADIZ, I think in this case it's
more justified then normal. The entire leadership of our country ( Both sides )is in one building for the sotu and it's a good idea to ratchet up security for that event. Which doesn't mean anything since we would elect new ones within 30 days. There is no reason for everyone to gather except for a media event (marketing by the political parties). The constitution says something about the president going before congress, by that can be done electronically, the same as he/she does when going before the American public. The State of the Union would possibly be shorter because there would be no delays for choreographed applause. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith wrote:
While I don't agree in the need for the ADIZ, I think in this case it's more justified then normal. The entire leadership of our country ( Both sides )is in one building for the sotu and it's a good idea to ratchet up security for that event. Which doesn't mean anything since we would elect new ones within 30 days. There is no reason for everyone to gather except for a media event (marketing by the political parties). The constitution says something about the president going before congress, by that can be done electronically, the same as he/she does when going before the American public. The State of the Union would possibly be shorter because there would be no delays for choreographed applause. and given the worst case scenario of all the likely candidates dying in one attack, just where will you find the new leaders? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Theune" wrote in message news ![]() john smith wrote: While I don't agree in the need for the ADIZ, I think in this case it's more justified then normal. The entire leadership of our country ( Both sides )is in one building for the sotu and it's a good idea to ratchet up security for that event. Which doesn't mean anything since we would elect new ones within 30 days. There is no reason for everyone to gather except for a media event (marketing by the political parties). The constitution says something about the president going before congress, by that can be done electronically, the same as he/she does when going before the American public. The State of the Union would possibly be shorter because there would be no delays for choreographed applause. and given the worst case scenario of all the likely candidates dying in one attack, just where will you find the new leaders? Just about anywhere and everywhere. Wannabe politicians are as rare as dirt. We have at least 7 hats in the ring for governor. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Dave Stadt" wrote)
Just about anywhere and everywhere. Wannabe politicians are as rare as dirt. We have at least 7 hats in the ring for governor. This guy has been interviewed on radio, TV, in newspapers ...now he's going to jail. http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/s13379.html You can't make this stuff up. http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S13863.html?cat=1 Oops. Off to jail son. Bad Impaler. Bad. http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/s13470.html However, his witchy wife has a strong case, IMHO. $$$$$ Montblack Great, another grappler in the Governor's mansion. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Theune" wrote in message
news ![]() and given the worst case scenario of all the likely candidates dying in one attack, just where will you find the new leaders? From the various states, their governors, legislatures, etc... The country would go on... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Grumman-581" wrote in message ... "John Theune" wrote in message news ![]() and given the worst case scenario of all the likely candidates dying in one attack, just where will you find the new leaders? From the various states, their governors, legislatures, etc... The country would go on... Certain politicians do not attend the State of The Union Message for the very reason that if something were to happen there would still be small but functioning government. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Stadt wrote:
Certain politicians do not attend the State of The Union Message for the very reason that if something were to happen there would still be small but functioning government. I once interviewed for a job in the financial world that had the same deal. Every employee was required to work from home one day a week, to ensure that there would be something left of the company should the office be attacked. It is also very common for companies to forbid more than N officers (or X% of any department) to fly on the same airline flight. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and given the worst case scenario of all the likely candidates dying in
one attack, just where will you find the new leaders? What makes you think there is a shortage of wannabe politicians? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Theune wrote:
and given the worst case scenario of all the likely candidates dying in one attack, just where will you find the new leaders? John, I could do much better than many of the congressmen/senators. And I would be ethical. Ron Lee |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|