![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Taxi is just nomenclature for the airplane moving along the ground.
"Takeoff run" would be more correct I guess, but in this case things are so weird, as it is ambiguous whether the plane is going to takeoff or not. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the treadmill is stationary and the belt speed is equal
to the required take-off speed, the airplane will have zero airspeed if it is "moving" in relation to the belt, the airplane is moving, the prop has thrust and is balancing the rearward movement of the belt. The tires are rolling, but the airplane is stationary and there is no airspeed or lift. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Doug" wrote in message oups.com... | Taxi is just nomenclature for the airplane moving along the ground. | "Takeoff run" would be more correct I guess, but in this case things | are so weird, as it is ambiguous whether the plane is going to takeoff | or not. | |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
If the treadmill is stationary and the belt speed is equal to the required take-off speed, the airplane will have zero airspeed if it is "moving" in relation to the belt, the airplane is moving, the prop has thrust and is balancing the rearward movement of the belt. The tires are rolling, but the airplane is stationary and there is no airspeed or lift. Let's take this to a logical extreme. The purpose of a wheel is to reduce friction, right? (Well, excluding steering and braking, since we aren't using the brakes here) Anyways, let's now assume that the airplane is sitting on the conveyor belt, and there is no friction between it and the belt. For all intents and purposes, you now have an antigravity device as your landing gear. Now run the engine up. If there is no friction between the airplane and the belt (and consequently no way to transmit force), how is the belt going to keep it stationary? Remember, sum of forces=mass*acceleration, and the sum of the forces in the horizontal plane is now mass*acceleration=thrust-drag (where drag is a function of airspeed squared). No force from the conveyor belt. Now let's put the wheels back on. Certainly, if a wheel's purpose is to try and reduce friction as much as possible, you aren't going to suddenly have some wheels that drag on you with as much thrust as your prop exerts... if it comes down to it, I'll write a Matlab simulation of this, and show the results to everyone. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Taken to the extreme, it might be considered ambiguous but that is only
nit-picking the puzzle. The general answer to the riddle is: if the plane has enough excess thrust to overcome the additional drag of friction of the wheels turning at twice the liftoff speed, the plane will fly. It will accelerate slower and require a longer run due to the excess friction, but it will fly. -- ------------------------------- Travis "Doug" wrote in message oups.com... Taxi is just nomenclature for the airplane moving along the ground. "Takeoff run" would be more correct I guess, but in this case things are so weird, as it is ambiguous whether the plane is going to takeoff or not. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
Navy sues man for plane he recovered in swamp | marc | Owning | 6 | March 29th 04 12:06 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |