![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jesse" wrote:
when you walk on a treadmill, do you have any significant airspeed(minus wind and fans)? you are moving forward relative to the treadmill belt only, your airspeed is zero, sure your legs are moving at say three miles per hour, and the treadmill belt is moving three miles per hour the opposite way, but without airspeed you have no lift(assuming your arms were airfoils). its not that complicated people. the thrust of the airplane is only used in most cases, to provide a movement of air over the wings to cause lift. if the supposed airplane is stationary to the air, regardless how much thrust is being used to "keep up" with the treadmill, no lift will be created, try it with an rc plane on a real treadmill if you dont believe me. Im not calling anyone stupid, but didnt everybody learn in PP ground school that ground speed has nothing to do with airspeed and the associated lift? thats one of the first things, the most basic of things that i was taught. im done with this topic. enjoy, let the roasting begin! Jester PP-ASEL A&P some people apparently have a hard time reading. "a conveyer belt that moves in the opposite direction at exactly the speed that the airplane is moving forward." When the conveyor belt is moving backwards at 80mph, how fast is the plane moving? Hint: there is no mention of how fast the plane is moving relative to the conveyor belt. If the plane is moving forward at 80mph, is it likely to have enough airspeed to fly? If you are still confused, when the plane is moving forward at 80mph, the conveyor will be moving backwards at 80mph, and a speedometer that measures off of tire rotation would indicate the plane's speed (before getting airborne) as 160mph, the speed relative to the conveyor. -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and a speedometer that
measures off of tire rotation would indicate the plane's speed (before getting airborne) as 160mph, the speed relative to the conveyor. While an airspeed indicator would indicate zero. -Robert, CFI |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" wrote:
and a speedometer that measures off of tire rotation would indicate the plane's speed (before getting airborne) as 160mph, the speed relative to the conveyor. While an airspeed indicator would indicate zero. -Robert, CFI Only if there is an 80 mph tailwind. -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only if there is an 80 mph tailwind.
If the plane is rolling 80mph against a conveyor going 80mph back the difference would be zero. -Robert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" wrote:
Only if there is an 80 mph tailwind. If the plane is rolling 80mph against a conveyor going 80mph back the difference would be zero. True. But I was referring to the problem stated, that the conveyor was moving the same speed and opposite direction to the speed and direction that the plane was MOVING, not this different scenario in which the conveyor was moving the opposite direction and same speed to that at which the plane's tires were turing. -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
Only if there is an 80 mph tailwind. If the plane is rolling 80mph against a conveyor going 80mph back the difference would be zero. BUT-what is the total friction force from the wheels? Certainly it's less than the thrust from the engine--I mean, that's what wheels are designed for, to have as little rolling friction as possible. So let's add this up... forces acting on airplane are thrust, aerodynamic drag, and an essentially negligible amount of drag from the wheels. Add it up, and since the thrust is greater than the drag (as it would be on a normal takeoff) the airplane accelerates. As I said in another post, since wheels are designed for minimal friction, just pretend that they are frictionless, and therefore not even there (anti-gravity airplane). What is the conveyor belt going to push against now? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the conveyor belt going to push against now?
The conveyor belt is pushing against the force of the prop through the air but we don't care. The problem stated that they are doing 80mph, we shouldn't worry about how the plane is able to do 80mph on the belt. -Robert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No. The plane is moving forward at 80mph. The wheels are the only thing
feeling the 160mph effect of the treadmill. This isn't a ground propelled vehicle. -- ------------------------------- Travis "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... and a speedometer that measures off of tire rotation would indicate the plane's speed (before getting airborne) as 160mph, the speed relative to the conveyor. While an airspeed indicator would indicate zero. -Robert, CFI |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
Navy sues man for plane he recovered in swamp | marc | Owning | 6 | March 29th 04 12:06 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |