![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, Dan, you do NOT have all the numbers on your side. Agreed, you can
calculate the amount of water in a saturated sample, but you cannot do the simple calculations unless you factor in how many airchanges you get inside of vented tanks in any given amount of time. I doubt sincerely that you can even estimate, no less calculate, this factor. Although if you can get me a government contract to study the issue, I'll be happy to consider doing the consulting work {;-) Jim "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "RST Engineering" wrote: (a) You can go through the math all day long and still not explain why I have drained the (hangared) 182 after a particularly humid day or two and get a tablespoon or two of water in the quick drains. I see: math is false and your charming story is proof. Very convincing. I have one too: I've been keeping a 172RG with 62-gal. capacity tanks outdoors in one of the most humid places in the U. S. for six years. I never top the tanks unless I specifically need to for the next flight. Only once in that time have I ever had water in a sample, and that was due to a bad fuel cap gasket. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RST Engineering wrote:
No, Dan, you do NOT have all the numbers on your side. Agreed, you can calculate the amount of water in a saturated sample, but you cannot do the simple calculations unless you factor in how many airchanges you get inside of vented tanks in any given amount of time. I doubt sincerely that you can even estimate, no less calculate, this factor. True, but I'll bet it isn't enough to get two quarts of water into 150 tanks! :-) Although if you can get me a government contract to study the issue, I'll be happy to consider doing the consulting work {;-) Better to stick with the electrons and leave the H2O alone. :-) Matt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" wrote: No, Dan, you do NOT have all the numbers on your side. Agreed, you can calculate the amount of water in a saturated sample, but you cannot do the simple calculations unless you factor in how many airchanges you get inside of vented tanks in any given amount of time. I doubt sincerely that you can even estimate, no less calculate, this factor. Actually, the tank respiration is fairly simple to calculate by knowing the high temp.and the low temp and calculating the quantity that would need to be added to maintain atmospheric pressure in the tank at the lower temperature. You will find, I believe, that even in extreme temperatures the air change would be fractional, even after many days. Remember also that when the air is most humid, the daily high/low temp. delta is smallest, thus limiting tank respiration when condensation conditions are optimum. Can you to supply any empirical evidence for your claims? Although if you can get me a government contract to study the issue, I'll be happy to consider doing the consulting work {;-) Another poster has mentioned an actual experiment by Cessna that failed to produce any detectable water due to condensation in the tanks. If anyone has a link to a description of this experiment, please post it. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Theft among friends | bumper | Soaring | 8 | July 29th 05 05:51 PM |
Theft From Baggage-Continental | [email protected] | Piloting | 73 | April 2nd 05 08:17 AM |
A-10s at Nashua, NH (ASH) today? | William W. Plummer | General Aviation | 0 | May 15th 04 04:03 PM |
Good News! Arrest in plane theft case | Jamie Rogers | Piloting | 10 | November 8th 03 06:43 AM |
Nashua Festival, Avidyne and WSI | Doug Vetter | Owning | 9 | September 24th 03 02:45 AM |