![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#181
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tony wrote: 176. cjcampbell Feb 6, 9:41 pm show options Newsgroups: rec.aviation.student, rec.aviation.piloting From: "cjcampbell" - Find messages by this author Date: 6 Feb 2006 18:41:35 -0800 Local: Mon, Feb 6 2006 9:41 pm Subject: Can a Plane on a Treadmill Take Off? Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse "cjcampbell" wrote Okay, I see why the plane moves forward normally no matter how fast the treadmill is going and even why it would not work in an automobile. Well, not exactly. This dead horse is fun to beat. Suppose I tell you the car is going forward at 60 mph. That means the belt is going the other way at 60, right? The speedometer would be indicating 120. The OP said the belt is moving backward as fast as the whatever is moving forward. When you substitute real numbers into the thing it becomes more clear. Or not. Apparently not to everyone. :-) The speedometer would indicate 60. |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the car had an airspeed indicator it would, I agree, indicate 60. In
the model I suggested the car is moving to the north at 60, the treadmill to the south at 60, and the speedometer will indicate 120. |
#183
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uh-Oh!!.....here we go again!
I vote -- 120 Kinda like an escalator. You can still go up on a "down" escalator if you run. The treadmill would have to be "set" at the 60 mph speed so that the car's "input" would not affect it. Then you could move faster "forward" than the treadmill is moving "backwards". You could also adjust the indicated speed to less than 60 and the conveyor would carry the car backwards at less than 60. All relative to the world. Speedometer says 60 - car is standing still. Speedometer says 120 - car moves forward 60 mph Speedometer says 0 - car moves backwards 60 mph The conveyor is just another stationary road in a different reference frame. Only this time it's not interacting with another frame's stuff (airmass). The conveyor could be on another planet....or BE another planet. "cjcampbell" wrote in message oups.com... Tony wrote: 176. cjcampbell Feb 6, 9:41 pm show options Newsgroups: rec.aviation.student, rec.aviation.piloting From: "cjcampbell" - Find messages by this author Date: 6 Feb 2006 18:41:35 -0800 Local: Mon, Feb 6 2006 9:41 pm Subject: Can a Plane on a Treadmill Take Off? Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse "cjcampbell" wrote Okay, I see why the plane moves forward normally no matter how fast the treadmill is going and even why it would not work in an automobile. Well, not exactly. This dead horse is fun to beat. Suppose I tell you the car is going forward at 60 mph. That means the belt is going the other way at 60, right? The speedometer would be indicating 120. The OP said the belt is moving backward as fast as the whatever is moving forward. When you substitute real numbers into the thing it becomes more clear. Or not. Apparently not to everyone. :-) The speedometer would indicate 60. |
#184
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The conveyor is just another stationary road in a different reference frame.
....but an airplane's "reference frame" is ALWAYS the surrounding/relative air, not the runway beneath it! The Monk |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Flyingmonk" wrote in message oups.com... The conveyor is just another stationary road in a different reference frame. ...but an airplane's "reference frame" is ALWAYS the surrounding/relative air, not the runway beneath it! The Monk Exactly,....that's why the airplane will take off. Tony brought up the prospect of replacing the airplane with a car. |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"muff528" wrote:
Uh-Oh!!.....here we go again! I vote -- 120 Kinda like an escalator. You can still go up on a "down" escalator if you run. The treadmill would have to be "set" at the 60 mph speed so that the car's "input" would not affect it. But that would change the problem. In the problem as stated, you would have to have a device that determined the cars forward speed (NOT its wheel speed) and feed that input to the speed regulator on the treadmill. -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A plane on a conveyor belt takes off East Bound at 9:15am from Peoria,
Il, while a 747 on a conveyor belt takes off West Bound at the same time from Hackensack NJ. What time and at what point will they meet? NEVER you morons. There is no air moving over the wings to produce any 'lift', much less any forward ground speed. I can't believe the stupid crap that people talk about here. |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alexy,
The conveyor is programmed to move in such a way as to maintain the aircraft at an airspeed of zero as measured at the pitot. Absolutely, if you CHANGED the problem, and restated it as above, then it wouldn't fly. Actually, you couldn't do that - which is another point the question makes. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#189
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually conveyor belt would decrease the length of runways if operated
in the direction of take off??? |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually conveyor belt would decrease the length of runways if operated
in the direction of take off??? Instead of wasting all that energy to power the conveyor belt, why not add that power to the plane itself? The Monk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
Navy sues man for plane he recovered in swamp | marc | Owning | 6 | March 29th 04 12:06 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |