![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Peter, Furthermore, if you intend to reinforce a person's post, I suggest you not begin the post with the words "on the contrary". I didn't get it, either ;-) Easy, boys! Bob, it took me a couple of readings initially to realize that what you meant was "I agree with your comment, Thomas, and furthermore, to the contrary of the post to which you were replying...". As Perter says, when you start a post with "on the contrary" it sounds like you are disagreeing with the post to which you were replying. Then it's left to the reader to puzzle out whether you didn't understand the post to which you were replying (and thought you were disagreeing when in fact you were agreeing) or whether it was just a careless wording, as I assumed. But, semantics aside, it sounds like the four of us are solidly on the side of a plane not just sitting stationary, spinning its wheels on a conveyer! -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry for the confusion. Everyone seems to have figured out what I meant.
I was in a hurry to leave for Utah to ski, which is why I haven't replied until now. I only just got back. Bottom line: The plane will take off just fine, unless there is a LOT of friction in the wheel bearings. -- Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways) "alexy" wrote in message ... Thomas Borchert wrote: Peter, Furthermore, if you intend to reinforce a person's post, I suggest you not begin the post with the words "on the contrary". I didn't get it, either ;-) Easy, boys! Bob, it took me a couple of readings initially to realize that what you meant was "I agree with your comment, Thomas, and furthermore, to the contrary of the post to which you were replying...". As Perter says, when you start a post with "on the contrary" it sounds like you are disagreeing with the post to which you were replying. Then it's left to the reader to puzzle out whether you didn't understand the post to which you were replying (and thought you were disagreeing when in fact you were agreeing) or whether it was just a careless wording, as I assumed. But, semantics aside, it sounds like the four of us are solidly on the side of a plane not just sitting stationary, spinning its wheels on a conveyer! -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL Bob, I thought for sure this horse was definitely dead. Hahaha.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
Navy sues man for plane he recovered in swamp | marc | Owning | 6 | March 29th 04 12:06 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |