|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
February 10th 06, 03:54 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
FAR 91.130 and the Definite Article
"Mike Granby" wrote in message oups.com... I guess the question is whether a controller's failure to comply with .65 in any way effects a VFR pilot's reponsbility to comply with 91.130. What controller's failure to comply with .65? 
|
|
#2
February 10th 06, 10:01 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
|
FAR 91.130 and the Definite Article
What controller's failure to comply with .65? The one that JG is alleging, and which I am accepting for the sake of argument.
|
|
#3
February 10th 06, 10:19 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
|
FAR 91.130 and the Definite Article
"Mike Granby" wrote in message oups.com... The one that JG is alleging, and which I am accepting for the sake of argument. JG? Something is missing. The message in which you state: "I guess the question is whether a controller's failure to comply with .65 in any way effects a VFR pilot's reponsbility to comply with 91.130." Appears as a response to a message from Newps, not JG. It's impossible to tell what you were referring to since you included no quoted material.
|
|
#4
February 11th 06, 12:57 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
|
FAR 91.130 and the Definite Article
Sorry -- a similar discussion is also occuring on a Piper owners' forum and JKG is there, too, so I something forget who said what to whom where!!! 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
