A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAR 91.130 and the Definite Article



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old February 10th 06, 08:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAR 91.130 and the Definite Article


"G Farris" wrote in message
...

Because of this:
http://www.faa.gov/atpubs/AIM/Chap4/aim0401.html#4-1-14
Once you're with them they don't expect you to "just leave".


They've forgotten about you. If they knew you were still with them they'd
have either terminated radar services or transferred communications before
you were so far inside approach control airspace.


  #3  
Old February 11th 06, 02:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAR 91.130 and the Definite Article

Because of this:
http://www.faa.gov/atpubs/AIM/Chap4/aim0401.html#4-1-14
Once you're with them they don't expect you to "just leave".


They've forgotten about you. If they knew you were still with them they'd
have either terminated radar services or transferred communications before
you were so far inside approach control airspace.


I've switched frequencies away from Chicago Center, when I could no longer
receive them (due to low altitudes) -- and they responded by calling the
airport manager at home, and having the poor schmuck go out to the airport
we landed at, looking for us.

They really don't like to have pilots leave their freq without permission.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #4  
Old February 11th 06, 01:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAR 91.130 and the Definite Article


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:MBbHf.767954$_o.645510@attbi_s71...

I've switched frequencies away from Chicago Center, when I could no longer
receive them (due to low altitudes) -- and they responded by calling the
airport manager at home, and having the poor schmuck go out to the airport
we landed at, looking for us.

They really don't like to have pilots leave their freq without permission.


All you know for certain is that just one doesn't like it.


  #5  
Old February 11th 06, 02:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAR 91.130 and the Definite Article

I've switched frequencies away from Chicago Center, when I could no
longer receive them (due to low altitudes) -- and they responded by
calling the airport manager at home, and having the poor schmuck go out
to the airport we landed at, looking for us.

They really don't like to have pilots leave their freq without
permission.


All you know for certain is that just one doesn't like it.


You really think that one controller in Chicago Center had the power and
authority to take it upon himself to call the airport manager at home and
drag his sorry heinie down to the airport, just because he was unhappy that
I lost radio contact with him?

The guy tracked me in to land at Rantoul, so he *knew* I was okay, which
eliminates the "he was concerned for my well-being" angle. So you think
this was just one guy with bean up his butt?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #6  
Old February 11th 06, 04:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAR 91.130 and the Definite Article



Jay Honeck wrote:



You really think that one controller in Chicago Center had the power and
authority to take it upon himself to call the airport manager at home and
drag his sorry heinie down to the airport, just because he was unhappy that
I lost radio contact with him?

The guy tracked me in to land at Rantoul, so he *knew* I was okay, which
eliminates the "he was concerned for my well-being" angle. So you think
this was just one guy with bean up his butt?



Of course not. There were several at the Center involved in this chain
of events.
  #7  
Old February 11th 06, 05:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAR 91.130 and the Definite Article


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:1lmHf.549388$084.128499@attbi_s22...

You really think that one controller in Chicago Center had the power and
authority to take it upon himself to call the airport manager at home and
drag his sorry heinie down to the airport, just because he was unhappy
that I lost radio contact with him?


Sure. In Aurora it takes only one person to dial a telephone number. How
many are needed in Iowa City?



The guy tracked me in to land at Rantoul, so he *knew* I was okay, which
eliminates the "he was concerned for my well-being" angle. So you think
this was just one guy with bean up his butt?


How did he *know* you were okay?

As I explained to you at that time, ATC is required to initiate a search
when there is an unexpected loss of radar contact and radio communications
with any IFR or VFR aircraft. How do you know that was not what was being
done?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.