![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It would be possible for someone to interpret "... the regulations under
which the flight is conducted" to indicate that because the pilot flying cannot legally fly in IMC, due to currency, that the pilot not flying is required. Yes. But the pilot flying is not required. OTOH, in VFR, the pilot flying (under the hood) =is= required, because the whole point of the flight is to train =that= pilot. A reasonable argument can be made that if the purpose of the IFR flight is also to train the pilot flying, then the pilot flying =would= also be a required crewmember, but this has not been addressd by chief counsel to my knowledge. Yes, the rules don't make sense. Yes, a different interpretation makes as much sense as this one. That's the way it is. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jose" wrote in message
... It would be possible for someone to interpret "... the regulations under which the flight is conducted" to indicate that because the pilot flying cannot legally fly in IMC, due to currency, that the pilot not flying is required. Yes. But the pilot flying is not required. OTOH, in VFR, the pilot flying (under the hood) =is= required, because the whole point of the flight is to train =that= pilot. A reasonable argument can be made that if the purpose of the IFR flight is also to train the pilot flying, then the pilot flying =would= also be a required crewmember, but this has not been addressd by chief counsel to my knowledge. I think the FAA's rationale for allowing the PIC safety pilot (along with the sole manipulator) to log PIC time under 61.51e1iii is that in order to fly according to 91.109b, you need to have the two pilots mentioned by that section; otherwise, you're flying according to some other regulation instead. In contrast, there's no regulation that mentions both pilots in the IMC/IFR training scenario. I agree that's a weak argument for letting the safety pilot log PIC time; but at rate, it's stronger than any argument that can be made for letting the IR-rated PIC log PIC time in the IMC/IFR scenario. --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OK, I'm off... | Simon Robbins | Rotorcraft | 15 | March 14th 05 12:44 AM |
Does FAA respond to FAQ questions? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 0 | July 6th 04 10:22 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Accelerated spin questions | John Harper | Aerobatics | 7 | August 15th 03 07:08 PM |