![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote in message ... "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message ... "Skylune" wrote in message For goodness sakes, a plane crash is NEWS! And you know why it's news Lune? Because it is still fairly rare. Much as the VP shooting a hunting partner is rare. Strictly speaking, he shot a poaching partner - Our VP didn't have the required license. With the proper license what is the bag limit for lawyers? :-) -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail Spell checking is left as an excercise for the reader. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G Farris wrote:
In article f1mIf.555301$084.131444@attbi_s22, says... However, if one makes errors that result in crashing, one is a REALLY "Bad Pilot". If I were to crash as the result of making a poor decision, or because of inadequate piloting skills, I would expect -- no, DEMAND -- that you guys rip me to shreds posthumously for being a "Bad Pilot" -- because that's exactly what I would have been. Where's the debate? That's sophmoric, Jay. You know better. The Air France captain who ran out of runway in Toronto last year - is he a BAD pilot? Or has he been downgraded even further now, to REALLY BAD pilot? Or perhaps, since no one was killed he is only a "pretty bad" pilot. Yes, a pilot who lands halfway down the runway and then runs off the end is definitely a bad pilot. A good pilot would have aborted the landing and come back again or diverted somewhere else. I am not trying to ridicule you - only to underscore what I think you already know : The quality of our action cannot be judged solely on the basis of the result. This is because we are all imperfect, and make mistakes and misjudgements all the time - not just once in a while. Every time you fly, Jay, you make mistakes. I'll go further - I'll bet almost every time you fly you make misjudgements serious enough to have killed other pilots, on other days, in other places . . . I'll bet the Air France guy makes fewer of these. So he's a bad pilot less often than Jay. What's your point? Matt |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B A R R Y" wrote in message ... On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:14:09 GMT, "Dave Stadt" wrote: With the proper license what is the bag limit for lawyers? :-) No limit... Just like rats... G Taste the same too I would guess. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G Farris wrote:
In article , says... So he's a bad pilot less often than Jay. What's your point? Matt My point is simple. There is such a thing as a bad pilot, but to define it as "one who has been involved in an accident" is unsatisfactory, and does not stand up to scrutiny. And your definition is...? Matt |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
That said, is there some other combinations of factors that could cause a pilot to crash that could occur if the pilot WEREN'T a "bad pilot"? Hail shafts, windshear. getting shot at, hi-jackers, wake turbulence, exceedingly optimistic braking reports from the tower, unforecast mountain rotor waves.... If you fly long enough, s**t happens. If Mr. Honeck flies long enough, eventually s**t will happen to him. Hopefully he will come out unscathed, but with a better understanding of the concept of 's**t happens'. You can quote every flying manual ever written verbatim, word for word, and Mother Nature can still get you. Mother Nature can't read. I have hired pilots who have crashes on their records. I will agree that most were for mechanical reasons. However, I have confidence in hiring someone that has been in a crash. These pilots have been tested. They were thrown a real emergency and they didn't panic. They dealt with it and lived. They passed the ultimate test. Ain't nothing like the real thing! D. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't you thinks it is normally a combination of factors for so called
Good Pilots? In some cases, its obvious that the crash is mainly due to a stupid pilot (like the idiot who just crashed into the house in Ca.) In others, something goes wrong and conditions amplify the problem (e.g. the carburateor heater craps out when you're on your last 15 gallons, the pattern is crowded, and there's lots of chatter on the radio). I'll bet you're right. But "the carb heat crapping out" (unless you mean the pilot didn't use it) is a mechanical failure -- which we have specifically ruled out of this discussion. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hail shafts, windshear. getting shot at, hi-jackers, wake turbulence,
exceedingly optimistic braking reports from the tower, unforecast mountain rotor waves.... If you fly long enough, s**t happens. If Mr. Honeck flies long enough, eventually s**t will happen to him. Hopefully he will come out unscathed, but with a better understanding of the concept of 's**t happens'. You can quote every flying manual ever written verbatim, word for word, and Mother Nature can still get you. Mother Nature can't read. I've experienced wind shear, severe wake turbulence, glare ice runways, and I've flown over the mountains. And, thanks to decent training and a dedication to flying that means I'm not only current, but proficient, I came through somewhat rattled, but unscathed. Getting shot at or being hijacked has (so far) not happened. I would tend to place those occurrences under the "mechanical failure -- out of the pilot's control" heading, quite frankly. This all said, I'm not sure I'm following your train of thought here. By saying "s*it happens" are you implying that I survived these challenges through luck? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Everyone makes bad decisions. It is not "ok" any more than hurricaines
are "ok". But they happen. Saying that is =not= saying that minimizing bad decisions, and minimizing the =impact= of bad decisions, is not important. It is. But badmouthing pilots does not help minimize bad decisions. Badmouthing pilots is an entirely separate issue. That's just bad manners, and falls under the heading of "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all." Place your bets where you will (and there are good and bad places to place your bets) but the dice still roll. I'll agree with you on mechanical issues. In that realm, sh*t happens, and can happen at any moment. On the piloting side, however, I think we are masters of our own fate. Your superior skill must outweigh the random acts of "bad luck" (for lack of a better phrase) throughout every phase of flight. When your skills fail, you fail -- and if it occurs at a critical moment of flight, you die. Pilot error is bad piloting. If we choose to believe that the guy who made a fatal error wasn't a bad pilot, that is charitable. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
hi-speed ejections | Bill McClain | Military Aviation | 37 | February 6th 04 09:43 AM |
F-15...Longish | Mike Marron | Military Aviation | 9 | October 7th 03 01:49 AM |