![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("stol" wrote)
My ignition system consists of dual MSD boxes,one fed throught the main buss and the other fed straight from the battery. I run a Optima gel cell unit that has 950 cca and can deliver enough voltage to run the ign for hours. Ignoring paperwork issues for the moment: Is this an ignition system that could be easily(?) retrofitted to a standard Cessna 172 / Piper Warrior? If yes, (guesstimating) what would the performance gains be over the factory stock ignition systems they're running now? 1%? 5%? 10%? Or is it mostly a reliability issue? Montblack |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ignoring paperwork issues for the moment: Is this an ignition system that could be easily(?) retrofitted to a standard Cessna 172 / Piper Warrior? If yes, (guesstimating) what would the performance gains be over the factory stock ignition systems they're running now? 1%? 5%? 10%? Or is it mostly a reliability issue? Montblack ////////////////////////////////// It is VERY reliable for sure. If I were to"experiment" with this concept all one would have to do is install a crank trigger to fire the boxes, have it set up so the plugs would fire every 360 degrees as to keep the distributing simple, who cares if the plugs spark during the overlap period, Two strokes do this. The MSD units can be fitted with timing curves so that will give a performance gain for sure. As for amount of HP gain, if I were younger and still had my R&D dyno I sold to Jasper engines a few years back I would experiment just to see what numbers would come up. My gut feeling is................8-12% |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ignoring paperwork issues for the moment: Is this an ignition system that
could be easily(?) retrofitted to a standard Cessna 172 / Piper Warrior? Here's something to ease the paperwork issues: http://www.unisonindustries.com/prod...ains_menu.html This system varies the timing on certified aircraft engines, but does not advance timing beyond the setting specified by the engine manufacturere. I don't know if this is because there are no gains to be had (25 degrees BTDC on an O-320, for example, should be plenty for 2700 RPM), or if the engine's TC would prohibit it. They do claim better performance at any power setting below max, though, and smoother operation. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newbie Qs on stalls and spins | Ramapriya | Piloting | 72 | November 23rd 04 04:05 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
automotive parts on airplane engines | Wallace Berry | Home Built | 15 | September 28th 03 02:55 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |