A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

About Good Pilots and Bad Pilots



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 19th 06, 07:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default About Good Pilots and Bad Pilots

Jim Macklin wrote:

I disagree, to save the child the flight must be successful
and on time. A professional flight, in a professional class
airplane is the only sure thing to save the child. The
personal involvement of the concerned pilot raises the risks
and reduces the chances of success.


In my scenario there is no other option. There is no commercial service
available. In my scenario, the ONLY option is to fly yourself in your
GA airplane. Do you still feel the same way?


The FAA has changed VFR rules for over the top and night
flights to try a regulatory means to preempt the choice of a
less safe option. If you're out just for fun, solo and you
kill yourself, aside from the bad PR and destruction of the
airplane, that is your choice. But an unsafe emergency
flight is risking more than your life.

I have run into a burning building and put the fire out
while it was still just in the electrical panel (it was a
motel and my wife and son were in the room less 50 feet from
the fire. I know what is involved in accepting a risk. I
had told my family to get dressed and outside while I was
grabbing the extinguisher.

If I needed a flight for a sick family member, I'd call a
detached professional.


Again, in my scenario this isn't an option. Either YOU make the flight
or your child dies. What is your decision?


Matt
  #2  
Old February 19th 06, 07:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default About Good Pilots and Bad Pilots

I still don't buy it that there is no other option, maybe in
1903-1928, maybe in the movies, but in the real world, there
is always the option to have the organ flown in rather than
you going to get it [a two way trip, long time] or even you
flying it in one way. You are not the only pilot, there are
at least two airports [or landing sites, roads and fields].
To save the child you have to survive and need a very high
probability of success and on time.

Now, consider this scenario, the only airplane in town, a 15
seat King Air 350 and you have flown a King Air 90. but are
not multiengine rated, let alone type rated in the 350. The
pilot of the 350 was captured by Muslim extremists and his
head was cut off. There are 25 allied troops and you in the
town. The rebels are about to attack.
1. Do you fly the airplane?
2. Do you take only 14 passengers or do you take off with
all 25 people crowded into the airplane. The King Air 350
will be inside the W&B with the mains full and the aux tanks
empty, maybe a little over gross if the troops take their
weapons and ammo.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P
Type rated BE300-350, BE400/MU400
--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
| Jim Macklin wrote:
|
| I disagree, to save the child the flight must be
successful
| and on time. A professional flight, in a professional
class
| airplane is the only sure thing to save the child. The
| personal involvement of the concerned pilot raises the
risks
| and reduces the chances of success.
|
| In my scenario there is no other option. There is no
commercial service
| available. In my scenario, the ONLY option is to fly
yourself in your
| GA airplane. Do you still feel the same way?
|
|
| The FAA has changed VFR rules for over the top and night
| flights to try a regulatory means to preempt the choice
of a
| less safe option. If you're out just for fun, solo and
you
| kill yourself, aside from the bad PR and destruction of
the
| airplane, that is your choice. But an unsafe emergency
| flight is risking more than your life.
|
| I have run into a burning building and put the fire out
| while it was still just in the electrical panel (it was
a
| motel and my wife and son were in the room less 50 feet
from
| the fire. I know what is involved in accepting a risk.
I
| had told my family to get dressed and outside while I
was
| grabbing the extinguisher.
|
| If I needed a flight for a sick family member, I'd call
a
| detached professional.
|
| Again, in my scenario this isn't an option. Either YOU
make the flight
| or your child dies. What is your decision?
|
|
| Matt


  #3  
Old February 19th 06, 07:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default About Good Pilots and Bad Pilots

Jim Macklin wrote:

I still don't buy it that there is no other option, maybe in
1903-1928, maybe in the movies, but in the real world, there
is always the option to have the organ flown in rather than
you going to get it [a two way trip, long time] or even you
flying it in one way. You are not the only pilot, there are
at least two airports [or landing sites, roads and fields].
To save the child you have to survive and need a very high
probability of success and on time.


It is my scenario so I determine the options. I've never seen anyone so
completely miss the point. The point has nothing to do with organs, it
has everything to do with risk being a complex equation involving both
benefit and cost.


Now, consider this scenario, the only airplane in town, a 15
seat King Air 350 and you have flown a King Air 90. but are
not multiengine rated, let alone type rated in the 350. The
pilot of the 350 was captured by Muslim extremists and his
head was cut off. There are 25 allied troops and you in the
town. The rebels are about to attack.
1. Do you fly the airplane?


Well, I'd certainly TRY to fly it. Not sure if I could.


2. Do you take only 14 passengers or do you take off with
all 25 people crowded into the airplane. The King Air 350
will be inside the W&B with the mains full and the aux tanks
empty, maybe a little over gross if the troops take their
weapons and ammo.


Sure, I'd give it a shot unless I knew for certain that putting all 25
onboard would have a near certainty of a crash on takeoff.

What's your point?

Matt
  #4  
Old February 19th 06, 08:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default About Good Pilots and Bad Pilots

My point was that in my scene there was no other option,
your scene presupposes hospitals, airports and a support
system, which means that there are options you choose to
ignore. The problem is that there are people reading this
who will see it as a reason to take the option and not look
for the safer alternative and they may not have your skill.

The point was understood, I also understand that people make
the wrong choice on a regular basis for all kinds of
reasons, but "wanting" to complete the trip as scheduled is
always a factor. Whether it is organs, funerals, weddings,
football games or a car race, pilots make bad decisions and
kill people. You can do a Google for each of those
situations and find one or more fatal accidents listed.
Google for "aircraft accident+NASCAR" just as an example...
Airplane Crash in Va. Kills 10 (washingtonpost.com) It's not
the first time members of NASCAR's close-knit community have
lost their lives in plane accidents. The sport's 1992
champion, Alan Kulwicki, ...
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/
articles/A59212-2004Oct24.html - Similar pages


Celebrity Crashes April 1, 1993: NASCAR driver Alan Kulwicki
(39) died in the crash of the Hooters ... While in flight,
the propeller of his aircraft failed from fatigue, ...
www.check-six.com/lib/Famous_Missing/
Celebrity_Plane_Crashes.htm - 45k - Cached - Similar pages


CNNSI.com - More Sports - Athletes in air-related crashes
.... April 1, 1993 -- Alan Kulwicki, NASCAR's 1992 champion,
in Blountville, Tenn. ... July 13, 1993 -- Davey Allison,
NASCAR driver, the day after a helicopter ...
http://www.cnnsi.com/more/news/1999/...athletes_plane -
28k - Cached - Similar pages


NASCAR.com - King Air 200 Fact Sheet - Oct 25, 2004 When
using accident rates as a measure of aircraft safety, it
must be remembered that the rates are based ... NASCAR.COM
TravelFor your racing travel needs ...
www.nascar.com/2004/news/
headlines/official/10/25/beech200_info/ - 30k - Cached -
Similar pages


NASCAR.COM - Daytona Countdown: '93 - Feb 7, 2005 There
was sad news in NASCAR in 1993, as Alan Kulwicki and Davey
Allison were killed in separate aircraft accidents.
Kulwicki's best finish in seven Daytona ...
http://www.nascar.com/2005/kyn/02/07...993/index.html
- 37k - Cached - Similar pages


Aircraft accidents (Prevention) Business Articles From
AllBusiness.com Subject: Aircraft accidents (Prevention)
SIC: Air Transportation, Scheduled, And Air Courier Services
Product: Federal Aviation Administration. 7. NASCAR's ...
http://www.allbusiness.com/periodica...11766-1-2.html
- 42k - Cached - Similar pages


Wizbang Ten Die in Nascar Team's Plane Crash. Ten Die in
Nascar Team's Plane Crash ... Most aircraft accidents are
due to pilot error rather than mechanical failure ...
wizbangblog.com/archives/004049.php - 68k - Cached -
Similar pages


Local News | News for Charlotte, North Carolina | WCNC.com |
Top ... Insider gives historical perspective on NASCAR
aircraft crashes. 10:58 PM EDT on Sunday, ... There have
been other accidents, although not deadly. ...
www.wcnc.com/news/topstories/stories/
wcnc-102404-al-other_crashes.204411dd.html - 41k - Cached -
Similar pages



--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.





"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
| Jim Macklin wrote:
|
| I still don't buy it that there is no other option,
maybe in
| 1903-1928, maybe in the movies, but in the real world,
there
| is always the option to have the organ flown in rather
than
| you going to get it [a two way trip, long time] or even
you
| flying it in one way. You are not the only pilot, there
are
| at least two airports [or landing sites, roads and
fields].
| To save the child you have to survive and need a very
high
| probability of success and on time.
|
| It is my scenario so I determine the options. I've never
seen anyone so
| completely miss the point. The point has nothing to do
with organs, it
| has everything to do with risk being a complex equation
involving both
| benefit and cost.
|
|
| Now, consider this scenario, the only airplane in town,
a 15
| seat King Air 350 and you have flown a King Air 90. but
are
| not multiengine rated, let alone type rated in the 350.
The
| pilot of the 350 was captured by Muslim extremists and
his
| head was cut off. There are 25 allied troops and you in
the
| town. The rebels are about to attack.
| 1. Do you fly the airplane?
|
| Well, I'd certainly TRY to fly it. Not sure if I could.
|
|
| 2. Do you take only 14 passengers or do you take off
with
| all 25 people crowded into the airplane. The King Air
350
| will be inside the W&B with the mains full and the aux
tanks
| empty, maybe a little over gross if the troops take
their
| weapons and ammo.
|
| Sure, I'd give it a shot unless I knew for certain that
putting all 25
| onboard would have a near certainty of a crash on takeoff.
|
| What's your point?
|
| Matt


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.