![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
I disagree, to save the child the flight must be successful and on time. A professional flight, in a professional class airplane is the only sure thing to save the child. The personal involvement of the concerned pilot raises the risks and reduces the chances of success. In my scenario there is no other option. There is no commercial service available. In my scenario, the ONLY option is to fly yourself in your GA airplane. Do you still feel the same way? The FAA has changed VFR rules for over the top and night flights to try a regulatory means to preempt the choice of a less safe option. If you're out just for fun, solo and you kill yourself, aside from the bad PR and destruction of the airplane, that is your choice. But an unsafe emergency flight is risking more than your life. I have run into a burning building and put the fire out while it was still just in the electrical panel (it was a motel and my wife and son were in the room less 50 feet from the fire. I know what is involved in accepting a risk. I had told my family to get dressed and outside while I was grabbing the extinguisher. If I needed a flight for a sick family member, I'd call a detached professional. Again, in my scenario this isn't an option. Either YOU make the flight or your child dies. What is your decision? Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I still don't buy it that there is no other option, maybe in
1903-1928, maybe in the movies, but in the real world, there is always the option to have the organ flown in rather than you going to get it [a two way trip, long time] or even you flying it in one way. You are not the only pilot, there are at least two airports [or landing sites, roads and fields]. To save the child you have to survive and need a very high probability of success and on time. Now, consider this scenario, the only airplane in town, a 15 seat King Air 350 and you have flown a King Air 90. but are not multiengine rated, let alone type rated in the 350. The pilot of the 350 was captured by Muslim extremists and his head was cut off. There are 25 allied troops and you in the town. The rebels are about to attack. 1. Do you fly the airplane? 2. Do you take only 14 passengers or do you take off with all 25 people crowded into the airplane. The King Air 350 will be inside the W&B with the mains full and the aux tanks empty, maybe a little over gross if the troops take their weapons and ammo. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P Type rated BE300-350, BE400/MU400 -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... | Jim Macklin wrote: | | I disagree, to save the child the flight must be successful | and on time. A professional flight, in a professional class | airplane is the only sure thing to save the child. The | personal involvement of the concerned pilot raises the risks | and reduces the chances of success. | | In my scenario there is no other option. There is no commercial service | available. In my scenario, the ONLY option is to fly yourself in your | GA airplane. Do you still feel the same way? | | | The FAA has changed VFR rules for over the top and night | flights to try a regulatory means to preempt the choice of a | less safe option. If you're out just for fun, solo and you | kill yourself, aside from the bad PR and destruction of the | airplane, that is your choice. But an unsafe emergency | flight is risking more than your life. | | I have run into a burning building and put the fire out | while it was still just in the electrical panel (it was a | motel and my wife and son were in the room less 50 feet from | the fire. I know what is involved in accepting a risk. I | had told my family to get dressed and outside while I was | grabbing the extinguisher. | | If I needed a flight for a sick family member, I'd call a | detached professional. | | Again, in my scenario this isn't an option. Either YOU make the flight | or your child dies. What is your decision? | | | Matt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
I still don't buy it that there is no other option, maybe in 1903-1928, maybe in the movies, but in the real world, there is always the option to have the organ flown in rather than you going to get it [a two way trip, long time] or even you flying it in one way. You are not the only pilot, there are at least two airports [or landing sites, roads and fields]. To save the child you have to survive and need a very high probability of success and on time. It is my scenario so I determine the options. I've never seen anyone so completely miss the point. The point has nothing to do with organs, it has everything to do with risk being a complex equation involving both benefit and cost. Now, consider this scenario, the only airplane in town, a 15 seat King Air 350 and you have flown a King Air 90. but are not multiengine rated, let alone type rated in the 350. The pilot of the 350 was captured by Muslim extremists and his head was cut off. There are 25 allied troops and you in the town. The rebels are about to attack. 1. Do you fly the airplane? Well, I'd certainly TRY to fly it. Not sure if I could. 2. Do you take only 14 passengers or do you take off with all 25 people crowded into the airplane. The King Air 350 will be inside the W&B with the mains full and the aux tanks empty, maybe a little over gross if the troops take their weapons and ammo. Sure, I'd give it a shot unless I knew for certain that putting all 25 onboard would have a near certainty of a crash on takeoff. What's your point? Matt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My point was that in my scene there was no other option,
your scene presupposes hospitals, airports and a support system, which means that there are options you choose to ignore. The problem is that there are people reading this who will see it as a reason to take the option and not look for the safer alternative and they may not have your skill. The point was understood, I also understand that people make the wrong choice on a regular basis for all kinds of reasons, but "wanting" to complete the trip as scheduled is always a factor. Whether it is organs, funerals, weddings, football games or a car race, pilots make bad decisions and kill people. You can do a Google for each of those situations and find one or more fatal accidents listed. Google for "aircraft accident+NASCAR" just as an example... Airplane Crash in Va. Kills 10 (washingtonpost.com) It's not the first time members of NASCAR's close-knit community have lost their lives in plane accidents. The sport's 1992 champion, Alan Kulwicki, ... www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ articles/A59212-2004Oct24.html - Similar pages Celebrity Crashes April 1, 1993: NASCAR driver Alan Kulwicki (39) died in the crash of the Hooters ... While in flight, the propeller of his aircraft failed from fatigue, ... www.check-six.com/lib/Famous_Missing/ Celebrity_Plane_Crashes.htm - 45k - Cached - Similar pages CNNSI.com - More Sports - Athletes in air-related crashes .... April 1, 1993 -- Alan Kulwicki, NASCAR's 1992 champion, in Blountville, Tenn. ... July 13, 1993 -- Davey Allison, NASCAR driver, the day after a helicopter ... http://www.cnnsi.com/more/news/1999/...athletes_plane - 28k - Cached - Similar pages NASCAR.com - King Air 200 Fact Sheet - Oct 25, 2004 When using accident rates as a measure of aircraft safety, it must be remembered that the rates are based ... NASCAR.COM TravelFor your racing travel needs ... www.nascar.com/2004/news/ headlines/official/10/25/beech200_info/ - 30k - Cached - Similar pages NASCAR.COM - Daytona Countdown: '93 - Feb 7, 2005 There was sad news in NASCAR in 1993, as Alan Kulwicki and Davey Allison were killed in separate aircraft accidents. Kulwicki's best finish in seven Daytona ... http://www.nascar.com/2005/kyn/02/07...993/index.html - 37k - Cached - Similar pages Aircraft accidents (Prevention) Business Articles From AllBusiness.com Subject: Aircraft accidents (Prevention) SIC: Air Transportation, Scheduled, And Air Courier Services Product: Federal Aviation Administration. 7. NASCAR's ... http://www.allbusiness.com/periodica...11766-1-2.html - 42k - Cached - Similar pages Wizbang Ten Die in Nascar Team's Plane Crash. Ten Die in Nascar Team's Plane Crash ... Most aircraft accidents are due to pilot error rather than mechanical failure ... wizbangblog.com/archives/004049.php - 68k - Cached - Similar pages Local News | News for Charlotte, North Carolina | WCNC.com | Top ... Insider gives historical perspective on NASCAR aircraft crashes. 10:58 PM EDT on Sunday, ... There have been other accidents, although not deadly. ... www.wcnc.com/news/topstories/stories/ wcnc-102404-al-other_crashes.204411dd.html - 41k - Cached - Similar pages -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... | Jim Macklin wrote: | | I still don't buy it that there is no other option, maybe in | 1903-1928, maybe in the movies, but in the real world, there | is always the option to have the organ flown in rather than | you going to get it [a two way trip, long time] or even you | flying it in one way. You are not the only pilot, there are | at least two airports [or landing sites, roads and fields]. | To save the child you have to survive and need a very high | probability of success and on time. | | It is my scenario so I determine the options. I've never seen anyone so | completely miss the point. The point has nothing to do with organs, it | has everything to do with risk being a complex equation involving both | benefit and cost. | | | Now, consider this scenario, the only airplane in town, a 15 | seat King Air 350 and you have flown a King Air 90. but are | not multiengine rated, let alone type rated in the 350. The | pilot of the 350 was captured by Muslim extremists and his | head was cut off. There are 25 allied troops and you in the | town. The rebels are about to attack. | 1. Do you fly the airplane? | | Well, I'd certainly TRY to fly it. Not sure if I could. | | | 2. Do you take only 14 passengers or do you take off with | all 25 people crowded into the airplane. The King Air 350 | will be inside the W&B with the mains full and the aux tanks | empty, maybe a little over gross if the troops take their | weapons and ammo. | | Sure, I'd give it a shot unless I knew for certain that putting all 25 | onboard would have a near certainty of a crash on takeoff. | | What's your point? | | Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|