A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 24th 06, 07:32 AM posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible

TRUTH wrote:

Pooh Bear wrote in
:

TRUTH wrote:

also , that's a red herring arugment. It has nothing to do with the
facts that do exist, such as the failed-cessna pilot flying a 757 at
400MPH.......


Do you have any evidence that whoever was supposed to be flying that
757 was indeed a 'failed Cessna pilot' or is it mere conjecture on
your part ?

Graham



I don't have it from mainstream media sources. But people (including Dr
Jones) has said it.


Dr Jones looks rather lame in view of his writing a paper, the subject of
which he isn't qualifed in !

If it was not true, it would have defininitely been
exposed by someone. If it's NOT true, maybe you can research it and prove
Jones and others wrong! If you CAN do that, it would be good. The Truth
movement wants to be based, simply, on truth.


Well..... I heard many reports that those hijackers who trained at flight
school on heavy jets weren't considered to be 'very good pilots' but I've
never come across the suggestion that any of them had failed a Cessna flight
test.

In fact, even to get onto an 'advanced' i.e. jet training course *requires* a
full private flying licence ! The flight schools simply won't accept 'failed
Cessna pilots'.

Graham


  #2  
Old February 24th 06, 10:15 PM posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible


Amazing how THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE is being defended, tooth and nail.

However, the events of 911 DID HAPPEN and they happened only like they
did, and it does not depend HOW WE SEE THEM, our perception is at
fault, not history.

Reality is complicated and sometimes seems illogical, but there WAS A
DEFINITIVE sequence of events.

Now, every one of you wonderful human beings has a built-in LIE
DETECTOR. Your brain is MADE FOR it.

In evolution Home-Boy Sapiens has prevailed because of her/his
out-smarting.

Now that's exactly the job-description of secret-service
spook-murder-arseholes.

Knowing that, we have to be double-clever and suspect a CON JOB.

con job No 1:

the arab hijackers pulled it off in plain sight, and we Americans were
just sleeping.

con job No 2:

We clever Special Ops used remote control and needed arab patsies.

Now, I ask you.

Given that the US military and US private business elites IN FACT
creamed the taxpayer and got jobs worth gazillions ... who benefitted,
and

WHO DID 911???

Come on, your built-in Lie-detector has already registered the
deceit... the needle of your sensors has already wiggled at the thought
that 9/11 was an inside job.

Let go, follow your instinct, become a hated conspiracy nut.

What is TRUTH worth if you have to pay the rent.

What do I care about communists and jewish people marching off to the
CONCENTRATION CAMP ... the NAZI party is good for business...

Oh, America is the greatest country... !!

  #3  
Old February 24th 06, 11:34 PM posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible

On 24 Feb 2006 14:15:25 -0800, wrote:


Amazing how THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE is being defended, tooth and nail.


It's better than any alternative proposed so far.

Reality is complicated and sometimes seems illogical, but there WAS A
DEFINITIVE sequence of events.


None of which involved micro-nukes, anti-matter, mind control, invisible
ninjas or time machines; every alternative theory I've seen to date requires at
least one of these elements.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible Miss L. Toe Piloting 11 February 23rd 06 02:25 PM
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible Jim Macklin Piloting 12 February 22nd 06 10:09 PM
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible Bob Gardner Piloting 18 February 22nd 06 08:25 PM
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible Scott M. Kozel Piloting 1 February 22nd 06 03:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.