![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
The lancair legacy, with the 310hp and retract will supposedly do 276mph at 8000' The fixed-gear legacy, with 200hp will supposedly do 210 mph at 8000' so, maybe the SR-22 would gain 30mph or so with a retractable... That's pretty significant. I suppose liability concerns are preventing them from considering folding gear? I'd think the concerns about their customers affording insurance would be greater than any concerns about manufacturers liability. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With the old fixed gear setup 30mph for gear might be about it. With
the newer more streamline gear, it is less. Retractable gear is an anethema. It needs to be tested, annualed and repaired and the pilot needs to remember to deploy it. It's unavoidable on some planes, but if you can get by without it, do so. Your life will be a lot easier. The faster you go, the more retract will gain you, that is true. On a slow airplane it's not much. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comanche accident averted last evening | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | April 13th 05 10:02 AM |
REAL BUDGET BUSTER | Cribsheet | Piloting | 2 | December 18th 04 10:02 PM |
Commanche alternatives? | John Cook | Military Aviation | 99 | March 24th 04 03:22 AM |
Commanche alternatives? | Kevin Brooks | Naval Aviation | 23 | March 24th 04 03:22 AM |
RAH-66 Comanche helicopter could face budget cuts in 2005 | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 0 | November 19th 03 02:18 PM |