Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11

TRUTH wrote:

Hmmmm. that's interesting. Yeah I did post that link, I got it from
somewhere without checking into it first, but the information is quite
interesting and am going to read though it. I understand what you mean
now.

I will read through it carefully later, but wanted to point out that
there are lots of opinions on 9/11, and not all of them will be true. For
instance, some people still believe in holligrams and no planes at the
WTC

You are not only stupid, but too lazy to read the first page of the
websites you link to. Now, please clarify. Do you believe that there was
or was not a 757 at the Pentagon? Or, are you saying there was a plane,
but not a 757? Its like you arguing that there were no hijackings, but
posted a link to an article that stated Bush knew about the hijackings
in advance.

"mrtravel" wrote in message
. com...
TRUTH wrote:

Hmmmm. that's interesting. Yeah I did post that link, I got it from
somewhere without checking into it first, but the information is quite
interesting and am going to read though it. I understand what you mean
now.

I will read through it carefully later, but wanted to point out that
there are lots of opinions on 9/11, and not all of them will be true.
For
instance, some people still believe in holligrams and no planes at the
WTC

You are not only stupid, but too lazy to read the first page of the
websites you link to. Now, please clarify. Do you believe that there was
or was not a 757 at the Pentagon? Or, are you saying there was a plane,
but not a 757? Its like you arguing that there were no hijackings, but
posted a link to an article that stated Bush knew about the hijackings
in advance.

Yes, all of the above.

Paul Nixon