Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible

"The Whole Truth" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:49:40 GMT, TRUTH wrote:

WTC 7 was a steel framed building and housed the mayor's 13
million
dollar command bunker. It is theorized that this bunker was
used to
control the Towers' demolitions (it was dust proof), and
therefore
needed to be destroyed for any evidence it may have.


It was pure luck that WTC 7 got hit by debris.

That's my entire point. What would have been the plan for WTC-7
if *NO DEBRIS
HAD HIT IT*? Blow up a completely intact building for nebulous
reasons you say
exist but won't state? Don't blow up the building and have tens
of thousands of
pounds of explosives found inside the gutted building? You do
know that you
have to gut a building before you perform a controlled demolition
on it, right?


Exactly. And the other obvious question is why on God's green earth
would the HQ of demolitions be placed so near ground zero? Wouldn't
it be more logical to put it somewhere else, where all the eyes and
tv-cameras would not be pointed? Then the base would not be in
danger while the alleged demolitions take place AND they can
evacuate the place in silence and in an organized fashion without a
need to demolish the whole thing.

And as The Whole Truth said; what would have been done, if the plane
parts did not hit WTC-7? The "demolition" would have looked highly
suspicious had the building not been on fire for hours.

TVirta