![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 337 is easy to fly (for a twin), has twin engine redundancy with
none of the VMC issues, displays good short field characteristics and is available with turbo, pressurization and deice options. The main problem is it is not a good trainer and instructors don't like them (because they have no Vmc issues, they are considered "for lightweight pilots"). The design is actually superior and the plane can take off on one engine (although maybe not at gross and it's not in the POH and not recommeded). True twin engine performance. The fact that it was not successful says more about the anemic GA market than the design of the plane. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Doug" wrote)
The fact that it was not successful says more about the anemic GA market than the design of the plane. The GA market was hopping when the C-337 was new. Montblack |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good point. Probably the CFI community that killed it more than
anything. NOT a trainer. In fact laughed at. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Owning | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |