![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been thinking that it would be cool to refit an old 337 with
twin jet engines mounted in place of the rear engine with snorkles for the intakes and a nose extension fairing in place of the front engine for drag reduction and CG adjustment. Given the advances in small jet engines in recent years, this might be feasible. Imagine the rate of climb you would get. You could run the throttles at a modest setting for cruise. There is an experimental aircraft for you! Dean Dallas wrote: Looking at the design of the C377, it seems like it should have been more of a winner. Why did it flop? Dallas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote)
I have been thinking that it would be cool to refit an old 337 with twin jet engines mounted in place of the rear engine with snorkles for the intakes and a nose extension fairing in place of the front engine for drag reduction and CG adjustment. Given the advances in small jet engines in recent years, this might be feasible. Imagine the rate of climb you would get. You could run the throttles at a modest setting for cruise. I'm waiting to see the real world numbers for the HondaJet - Plane and/or engine. Engine guys at Oshkosh said Honda was considering selling just the power plant to others. Montblack |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Eclipse 500 will sell for about what a new Beech 58G
Baron will sell for, as soon as I win the lottery, I'll make my deposit. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Montblack" wrote in message ... | wrote) | I have been thinking that it would be cool to refit an old 337 with twin | jet engines mounted in place of the rear engine with snorkles for the | intakes and a nose extension fairing in place of the front engine for drag | reduction and CG adjustment. Given the advances in small jet engines in | recent years, this might be feasible. Imagine the rate of climb you would | get. You could run the throttles at a modest setting for cruise. | | | I'm waiting to see the real world numbers for the HondaJet - Plane and/or | engine. | | Engine guys at Oshkosh said Honda was considering selling just the power | plant to others. | | | Montblack | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com... I have been thinking that it would be cool to refit an old 337 with twin jet engines mounted in place of the rear engine with snorkles for the intakes and a nose extension fairing in place of the front engine for drag reduction and CG adjustment. snip There is an experimental aircraft for you! Actually, you would be implementing / developing an STC, not building a new experimental aircraft... The rules are a bit stricter for that... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Knowing how flimsily Cessna tends to make their designs,
using the thinnest possible metals, etc, a re-engine job is critical. Airplanes have speed and power limits, both for structural strength and aerodynamics...the 337 is pretty well at that point as sold by Cessna. wrote in message oups.com... |I have been thinking that it would be cool to refit an old 337 with | twin jet engines mounted in place of the rear engine with snorkles for | the intakes and a nose extension fairing in place of the front engine | for drag reduction and CG adjustment. Given the advances in small jet | engines in recent years, this might be feasible. Imagine the rate of | climb you would get. You could run the throttles at a modest setting | for cruise. | | There is an experimental aircraft for you! | | Dean | | Dallas wrote: | Looking at the design of the C377, it seems like it should have been more of | a winner. Why did it flop? | | | Dallas | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Jim,
That is true, but if the jet engines were small enough they wouldn't necessarily overpower the airframe. There are some really small turbines out these days... Dean |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A jet needs to be faster to be efficient, the airframe is
not designed for Mach 0.60, let alone real jet speeds. wrote in message ups.com... | Hi Jim, | | That is true, but if the jet engines were small enough they wouldn't | necessarily overpower the airframe. There are some really small | turbines out these days... | | Dean | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Owning | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |