A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 28th 06, 09:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?

I have been thinking that it would be cool to refit an old 337 with
twin jet engines mounted in place of the rear engine with snorkles for
the intakes and a nose extension fairing in place of the front engine
for drag reduction and CG adjustment. Given the advances in small jet
engines in recent years, this might be feasible. Imagine the rate of
climb you would get. You could run the throttles at a modest setting
for cruise.

There is an experimental aircraft for you!

Dean

Dallas wrote:
Looking at the design of the C377, it seems like it should have been more of
a winner. Why did it flop?


Dallas


  #2  
Old February 28th 06, 09:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?

wrote)
I have been thinking that it would be cool to refit an old 337 with twin
jet engines mounted in place of the rear engine with snorkles for the
intakes and a nose extension fairing in place of the front engine for drag
reduction and CG adjustment. Given the advances in small jet engines in
recent years, this might be feasible. Imagine the rate of climb you would
get. You could run the throttles at a modest setting for cruise.



I'm waiting to see the real world numbers for the HondaJet - Plane and/or
engine.

Engine guys at Oshkosh said Honda was considering selling just the power
plant to others.


Montblack

  #3  
Old February 28th 06, 09:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?

The Eclipse 500 will sell for about what a new Beech 58G
Baron will sell for, as soon as I win the lottery, I'll make
my deposit.



--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"Montblack" wrote in
message ...
| wrote)
| I have been thinking that it would be cool to refit an
old 337 with twin
| jet engines mounted in place of the rear engine with
snorkles for the
| intakes and a nose extension fairing in place of the
front engine for drag
| reduction and CG adjustment. Given the advances in small
jet engines in
| recent years, this might be feasible. Imagine the rate
of climb you would
| get. You could run the throttles at a modest setting for
cruise.
|
|
| I'm waiting to see the real world numbers for the
HondaJet - Plane and/or
| engine.
|
| Engine guys at Oshkosh said Honda was considering selling
just the power
| plant to others.
|
|
| Montblack
|


  #4  
Old February 28th 06, 09:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?

wrote in message
oups.com...
I have been thinking that it would be cool to refit an old 337 with
twin jet engines mounted in place of the rear engine with snorkles for
the intakes and a nose extension fairing in place of the front engine
for drag reduction and CG adjustment.

snip
There is an experimental aircraft for you!


Actually, you would be implementing / developing an STC, not building a new
experimental aircraft... The rules are a bit stricter for that...


  #5  
Old February 28th 06, 09:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?

Knowing how flimsily Cessna tends to make their designs,
using the thinnest possible metals, etc, a re-engine job is
critical. Airplanes have speed and power limits, both for
structural strength and aerodynamics...the 337 is pretty
well at that point as sold by Cessna.


wrote in message
oups.com...
|I have been thinking that it would be cool to refit an old
337 with
| twin jet engines mounted in place of the rear engine with
snorkles for
| the intakes and a nose extension fairing in place of the
front engine
| for drag reduction and CG adjustment. Given the advances
in small jet
| engines in recent years, this might be feasible. Imagine
the rate of
| climb you would get. You could run the throttles at a
modest setting
| for cruise.
|
| There is an experimental aircraft for you!
|
| Dean
|
| Dallas wrote:
| Looking at the design of the C377, it seems like it
should have been more of
| a winner. Why did it flop?
|
|
| Dallas
|


  #6  
Old February 28th 06, 09:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?

Hi Jim,

That is true, but if the jet engines were small enough they wouldn't
necessarily overpower the airframe. There are some really small
turbines out these days...

Dean

  #7  
Old March 1st 06, 02:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?

A jet needs to be faster to be efficient, the airframe is
not designed for Mach 0.60, let alone real jet speeds.


wrote in message
ups.com...
| Hi Jim,
|
| That is true, but if the jet engines were small enough
they wouldn't
| necessarily overpower the airframe. There are some really
small
| turbines out these days...
|
| Dean
|


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! Enea Grande Owning 1 November 4th 03 12:57 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.