A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New demands for more GA security



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 2nd 06, 09:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New demands for more GA security

"Matt Barrow" wrote in news:6LENf.18$w4.3818
@news.uswest.net:

"Skywise" wrote in message
...


Snipola

Highlighting my statement.

*****************************
-----------------------------
*I* can agree to disagree.

-----------------------------
*****************************


Except one's opinion can be based on facts, the other person's opinion on
hearsay, emotions, and fantasy.

So which side is the one that bases their positions on "emotions"?


And apparently you can't.

To be honest, I don't care what you think. I think you are wrong.
I am willing to consider both our sides opinions. Opinions are
never right or wrong. They are opinions.

I did this as a gracefully way of avoiding a religious flame war
in this aviation group.

Please take the hint.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
  #2  
Old March 2nd 06, 10:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New demands for more GA security


"Skywise" wrote in message
...
"Matt Barrow" wrote in news:6LENf.18$w4.3818
@news.uswest.net:

So which side is the one that bases their positions on "emotions"?


And apparently you can't.


Seems you go into the latter category.

To be honest, I don't care what you think. I think you are wrong.
I am willing to consider both our sides opinions. Opinions are
never right or wrong. They are opinions.


My opinion is that all people over 55 and under 25 should be euthanized --
so that wouldn't be wrong, huh?

Post-modern prattwaddle.

Okay, now that that issue is understood -- over and out!!







  #3  
Old March 3rd 06, 12:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New demands for more GA security

"Matt Barrow" wrote in
:


"Skywise" wrote in message
...
"Matt Barrow" wrote in news:6LENf.18$w4.3818
@news.uswest.net:

So which side is the one that bases their positions on "emotions"?


And apparently you can't.


Seems you go into the latter category.

To be honest, I don't care what you think. I think you are wrong.
I am willing to consider both our sides opinions. Opinions are
never right or wrong. They are opinions.


My opinion is that all people over 55 and under 25 should be euthanized
-- so that wouldn't be wrong, huh?

Post-modern prattwaddle.

Okay, now that that issue is understood -- over and out!!


Ok...I've been trying to be nice about this. So fine...since I need
to be an asshole, so be it.

asshole mode

Go take your 'opinion' and shove it up your ass, ok?

I have no interest in getting into a ****ing debate over it, ok?

What part of this do you NOT ****ING UNDERSTAND?

Do I need to make a big issue of PLONKING you?

/asshole mode

OK? Is that better?

It's really simple. I could forsee the discussion getting really
heated and I just didn't want to mess with that, ok? I hate getting
drawn into flame wars. I see both your's and my sides as opinions,
and those can make for really hot flame wars, especially considering
the subject being a religious one. I'm simply trying to avoid what is
obviously turning into a big debacle over a simple misunderstanding.

I'm simply suggesting we both quit now because getting into a big
argument over it isn't going to accomplish a damned thing except
cause a lot of hard feelings.

Again, I can agree to disagree. I feel you are as entitled to your
position as I am to mine. Let's just leave it at that, OK?

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pilots Group Grades U.S. Aviation Security an 'F' George Patterson Piloting 33 March 13th 05 12:58 PM
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots paul k. sanchez Piloting 19 September 27th 04 11:49 PM
TSA's General Aviation Airport Security Recommendations Might Become Requirements Larry Dighera Piloting 1 February 25th 04 05:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.